Skip to main content

Brazil: An Inauspicious Start to Pre-Salt Auctions



More than five years after Brazil discovered massive oil reserves thousands of meters underneath the sea floor, the country's prospects of imminently becoming an economic and energy power are fading. On Monday, Brazil hosted its first auction of one of these fields, now known as pre-salt fields, but the event was met with skepticism and unrest. The inauspicious beginning shows how Brazil's geopolitical constraints have tempered once-promising expectations and how the country will have to focus on its domestic affairs.

Back in 2007, Brazil was in a state of euphoria. A consortium led by state-controlled Petrobras discovered the Tupi field in the pre-salt layer, a geological formation off the continental shelf of Brazil's coast that holds significant hydrocarbon resources. The Brazilian economy was growing by more than 6 percent per year, and there was a widespread feeling that Brazil would become a global energy and economic power. The country's largest companies were rapidly expanding and exerting their economic heft regionally and internationally. In a moment of hubris indicative of the era, former Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva famously remarked that the Tupi discovery proves that "God is Brazilian."

But now the mood in Brazil is dramatically different. Since 2010, both oil production and economic growth have stagnated as demand for fossil fuels has grown. Companies that were once excited about the discovery of pre-salt fields are now complaining about the unfavorable conditions of the new regulatory regime, which was drafted in 2008 and 2012. Oil workers and civilians claim the government is effectively selling out the country to foreign interests. Whereas it once appeared to be on the verge of becoming a major energy player, Brazil now is struggling to increase oil production at home.

This shift was on full display Monday as Brazil's National Petroleum Agency auctioned off the Libra bloc, which is expected to contain some 8-12 billion barrels of technically recoverable reserves, potentially doubling the country's total proven reserves and rivaling Tupi as the country's largest field. However, the auction had a lukewarm turnout; only 11 firms participated, compared to 71 firms in the previous conventional auction. The auction was further tainted by a strike involving members from Petrobras' workforce that eventually required military intervention to ensure order.

The field was ultimately auctioned off to a consortium composed of Petrobras (40 percent), Royal Dutch/Shell (20 percent), France's Total (20 percent), China National Petroleum Corp. (10 percent) and China National Offshore Oil Corp. (10 percent). Notably, the consortium's was the only bid made, and it offered the government the bare minimum of profits -- 41.65 percent -- under the new production-sharing regime. Given that no one firm should shoulder the entire 70 percent stake available, the "auction" was simply a way for firms to buy into a consortium to develop a pre-salt field. And since this was the first such auction under the new regulatory regime, it was also seen as a way to gauge the viability of the new system.

Neither a complete success nor failure, the auction demonstrates the ongoing constraints faced by Brasilia. On one hand, the country needs investment and foreign partners if it wants to increase hydrocarbon production. Pre-salt is simply too risky and expensive for Petrobras to develop alone, but the risks and the price tags have discouraged many firms from participating in pre-salt projects. On the other, the government wanted to keep Petrobras at the forefront of the technological frontier. It also wanted to support local industries and use the proceeds from the energy sector to fund its ambitious investment plans in education, health and infrastructure.

Ultimately it was these imperatives that led to the creation of the new regulatory system. The system ensured that Petrobras would have at least a 30 percent stake in every project; that it would be the primary operator; that firms would buy between 37 percent and 55 percent of their materials locally; and that proceeds would be tied to health and education investment. Moreover, Brasilia set a $7 billion signature bonus, making upfront costs extremely high. Unsurprisingly, these restrictions made participation costlier and riskier, forcing firms to either abstain from participation, as all U.S. firms did, or form into consortia to divide up the risk associated with the project.

Combined with changing global economic developments, the new regulatory environment has forced the country's major economic players to reconsider their plans for expansion. Investment abroad was formerly a significant lever for Brasilia, but Petrobras spent much of the past few years divesting its assets in Argentina, Peru, Colombia and the Gulf of Mexico to help finance its ambitious $237 billion investment plan. Rather than exerting its influence regionally, Brazil is reinvesting its money back home.

Brazil meanwhile had hoped to become a significant exporter of fossil fuels. But in order to maintain fuel subsidies, Brasilia forced Petrobras to import refined petroleum products and sell them at a loss. As a result, exports of crude oil have fallen, while imports of refined product have increased. Since the 2007 pre-salt discovery, Brazil's energy trade balance has actually worsened as Brasilia has tried to prioritize maintaining social stability at home through subsidies.

The nationwide protests in July 2013 and the Oct. 21 pre-salt auctions are somewhat foreboding. The country's challenges have come into focus this year in a way that was disguised by the prosperity of the 2000s. Development is not something that happens overnight; it is a long process requiring political and economic sensibility and skill. As the past six years have demonstrated, the pre-salt reserves will not propel the country into a new role as an economic and energy power. But at least they offer the country a way to continue the slow process of maturing into a stronger and more stable economy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why States Still Use Barrel Bombs

Smoke ascends after a Syrian military helicopter allegedly dropped a barrel bomb over the city of Daraya on Jan. 31.(FADI DIRANI/AFP/Getty Images) Summary Barrel bombs are not especially effective weapons. They are often poorly constructed; they fail to detonate more often than other devices constructed for a similar purpose; and their lack of precision means they can have a disproportionate effect on civilian populations. However, combatants continue to use barrel bombs in conflicts, including in recent and ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, and they are ideally suited to the requirements of resource-poor states. Analysis Barrel bombs are improvised devices that contain explosive filling and shrapnel packed into a container, often in a cylindrical shape such as a barrel. The devices continue to be dropped on towns all over Syria . Indeed, there have been several documented cases of their use in Iraq over the past months, and residents of the city of Mosul, which was re

Russia Looks East for New Oil Markets

Click to Enlarge In the final years of the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began orienting his foreign policy toward Asia in response to a rising Japan. Putin has also piloted a much-touted pivot to Asia, coinciding with renewed U.S. interest in the area. A good expression of intent was Russia's hosting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2012 in Vladivostok, near Russia's borders with China and North Korea. Although its efforts in Asia have been limited by more direct interests in Russia's periphery and in Europe, Moscow recently has been able to look more to the east. Part of this renewed interest involves finding new export markets for Russian hydrocarbons. Russia's economy relies on energy exports, particularly crude oil and natural gas exported via pipeline to the West. However, Western Europe is diversifying its energy sources as new supplies come online out of a desire to reduce its dependence on Russian energy supplies . This has

LONDON POLICE INDIRECTLY ENCOURAGE CRIMINALS TO ATTACK RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC PROPERTY

ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGE A few days ago an unknown perpetrator trespassed on the territory of the Russian Trade Delegation in London, causing damage to the property and the vehicles belonging to the trade delegation , Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said during the September 12 press briefing. The diplomat revealed the response by the London police was discouraging. Police told that the case does not have any prospects and is likely to be closed. This was made despite the fact that the British law enforcement was provided with video surveillance tapes and detailed information shedding light on the incident. By this byehavior, British law inforcements indirectly encourage criminals to continue attacks on Russian diplomatic property in the UK. Zakharova’s statement on “Trespassing on the Russian Trade Mission premises in London” ( source ): During our briefings, we have repeatedly discussed compliance with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, specif