Skip to main content

A Chronology of Militancy in the Russian Caucasus


Analysis


Editor's Note: As global attention turns to Russia during the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi -- with questions about security and culture at the fore -- Stratfor is publishing collections of analyses that illuminate the geopolitical context of the region. Part one looks at Russia's resurgence. The following is the second installment of this series.

Security concerns about militants in the Russian Caucasus have dominated talk ahead of the Winter Olympics in Sochi. Russia inherently breeds instability because it is so large and home to hundreds of ethnicities -- many of which have never wanted to submit to Moscow's authority. The primary cauldron for hostilities is in the Russian Caucasus, a relatively small and mountainous territory home to dozens of ethnic groups, republics and religions. Though the region's rebels pose an obvious threat, the rebels themselves and the threats they pose differ from those faced by Russia in the past. Below is a chronology of Stratfor's coverage of the evolution of militancy in the Russian Caucasus.

Chechnya Ready to Explode Again

May 1, 1997: In 1997, Stratfor recognized that though Russia had just ended a war in the Caucasus republic of Chechnya two years prior, that another war was brewing.



Click to Enlarge




The First Chechen War had started off as a response to the fall of the Soviet Union and Chechen nationalists looking for independence and greater control in the Caucasus. But at the end of the war, there was an infusion of pan-Islamist militants, under the guise of a series of groups under Shamil Basayev. These more ideological militants launched a series of large-scale terrorist attacks on a scale Russia had never seen. In 1995, Basayev's group of more than 100 militants seized a hospital and took nearly 2,000 Russians hostage, killing 129.

This type of attack was a dramatic change in militancy, boosting Chechen separatism and volunteers for the more radical militancy brewing in the Caucasus. These large terrorist events became much more frequent when the Second Chechen War began in 1999. In 2002, nearly 50 Chechen militants took 900 people in a Moscow theater hostage. In 2004, two female suicide bombers simultaneously took down two airplanes flying out of Moscow. Also in 2004, more than 30 Chechens took a school containing more than 1,000 people, mostly children, hostage in Beslan, killing more than 300.

Russia: Putin, Beslan and the Limits of Rhetoric

Sept. 7, 2004: Beslan was a turning point for Russia's response to militancy emanating from the Caucasus. The Russian government had a two-fold approach to crushing the Caucasus militants. The first step was to separate the types of militants in the Caucasus between nationalists, and those more ideologically Islamist, like Basayev's group. The Kremlin co-opted the nationalists, transforming them into regional leaders. This led to the rise of current head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov, and his now 40,000-member pro-Kremlin Chechen brigades.

For the second step, the Kremlin sought to wipe out the more ideologically committed militants, which included killing Basayev in 2006. This process was aided by the fact that the Russian military and intelligence services had been strengthened a great deal since their post-Soviet period of weakness by the middle of the Second Chechen War. Consequently, the Russian government was able to use much more aggressive tactics against militancy that it simply was not capable of during the first war.

Russia: The Death of Basayev and the Second-Tier Commanders to Come

July 10, 2006: This approach was effective enough that Russia was able to formally end the war in 2009, though militant activity in the region continues.

Russia Announces Mission Complete

April 16, 2009: Militant groups today are very different than those seen a decade ago. The organization of the militant groups, such as those under the umbrella of the Caucasus Emirate, is much looser and has far fewer active militants. The current militant groups are highly restricted by pressure from the Russian security apparatus, the domestic Caucasus forces that have been co-opted by the Kremlin and by a shrinking supply of resources and militants after more than two decades of fighting. At present, militancy is highly constrained, both in terms of reach and capability.

Special Series: Origins of the Caucasus Emirate

May 23, 2011: Due to the erosion of these groups' abilities, all the recent attacks since the end of the war have been small in size, typically carried out by one or two bombers, and against soft targets like buses or an airport entrance. This is not to say that militants in the Caucasus no longer desire to launch high-profile strikes against Russia, but they do not appear capable of pulling off large-scale attacks or attacks against more difficult targets, as seen in the past.

Sochi 2014: A Security Challenge

Dec. 9, 2013: Clearly, security is a paramount concern for Russia during the Olympics, but it is a concern that must be viewed in the context of the currently hampered militant movements.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why States Still Use Barrel Bombs

Smoke ascends after a Syrian military helicopter allegedly dropped a barrel bomb over the city of Daraya on Jan. 31.(FADI DIRANI/AFP/Getty Images) Summary Barrel bombs are not especially effective weapons. They are often poorly constructed; they fail to detonate more often than other devices constructed for a similar purpose; and their lack of precision means they can have a disproportionate effect on civilian populations. However, combatants continue to use barrel bombs in conflicts, including in recent and ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, and they are ideally suited to the requirements of resource-poor states. Analysis Barrel bombs are improvised devices that contain explosive filling and shrapnel packed into a container, often in a cylindrical shape such as a barrel. The devices continue to be dropped on towns all over Syria . Indeed, there have been several documented cases of their use in Iraq over the past months, and residents of the city of Mosul, which was re

Russia Looks East for New Oil Markets

Click to Enlarge In the final years of the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began orienting his foreign policy toward Asia in response to a rising Japan. Putin has also piloted a much-touted pivot to Asia, coinciding with renewed U.S. interest in the area. A good expression of intent was Russia's hosting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2012 in Vladivostok, near Russia's borders with China and North Korea. Although its efforts in Asia have been limited by more direct interests in Russia's periphery and in Europe, Moscow recently has been able to look more to the east. Part of this renewed interest involves finding new export markets for Russian hydrocarbons. Russia's economy relies on energy exports, particularly crude oil and natural gas exported via pipeline to the West. However, Western Europe is diversifying its energy sources as new supplies come online out of a desire to reduce its dependence on Russian energy supplies . This has

LONDON POLICE INDIRECTLY ENCOURAGE CRIMINALS TO ATTACK RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC PROPERTY

ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGE A few days ago an unknown perpetrator trespassed on the territory of the Russian Trade Delegation in London, causing damage to the property and the vehicles belonging to the trade delegation , Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said during the September 12 press briefing. The diplomat revealed the response by the London police was discouraging. Police told that the case does not have any prospects and is likely to be closed. This was made despite the fact that the British law enforcement was provided with video surveillance tapes and detailed information shedding light on the incident. By this byehavior, British law inforcements indirectly encourage criminals to continue attacks on Russian diplomatic property in the UK. Zakharova’s statement on “Trespassing on the Russian Trade Mission premises in London” ( source ): During our briefings, we have repeatedly discussed compliance with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, specif