Russia's Interests in the Ukraine are Reasonable and Need to be Accommodated

By John Pedler

The 'West' (US, UK and EU) has made many grave mistakes in handling the Ukraine crisis which is one largely of its making - first belittling President Putin's 'frank' but conciliatory speech complaining about 'hyper use of power' by the US at the 2007 Munich security conference. Then following this with G W Bush's proposal in 2008 that both Georgia and the Ukraine should join NATO - breaking the US word to Gorbachev that NATO would not go further East in return for Soviet acceptance of East Germany's membership of NATO. So this confrontation has been brewing since then and no one has bothered to see this coming, let alone do anything about it once G W Bush was gone. 'The West' didn't even learn from the Georgia/Russia war that the same thing could happen over the Ukraine!

Surely the ‘West’ must now very urgently make a proposal that takes into account Russia's interests in its 'Near West' with a deal Russia can accept and would appear most unreasonable if it did not. President Putin may be unreasonable but Russia's very real interests in the Ukraine are reasonable and need to be accommodated. But equally the Ukraine is the EU's 'Near East'. The EU does not want Russia on its borders. Putin is striking fear into the Poles and others next to the Ukraine. The EU too, has very real and reasonable interests in the Ukraine.

If 'the West' wants to resolve this crisis satisfactorily, it must make an offer that Russia cannot reasonably refuse. When making any such offer it is essential that the EU as a whole make clear that it will apply truly stiff sanctions without regard to its financial interests. At present Putin calculates that the ‘West’ will do nothing that significantly harms these.

Here, I suggest, are the essentials for a deal:- Sebastopol Black Sea naval base and facilities to Russia in perpetuity (not leased); the Ukraine to have no military alliances with anyone; both Russia (renewing its offer) and EU to give $15bn each to Ukraine (the 30bn needed for immediate debts and for a joint plan for Ukrainian development); any preferential economic treatment for the Ukraine to be granted to both Russia and the EU; set up a joint EU/Russia commission for the Ukraine to signal any breach of the agreement and to coordinate joint aid.

Obviously this needs to be fleshed out, but something like this skeleton should suffice. The aim is not simply to defuse this crisis in possible, but to lay the foundations for a much closer relationship between the EU and Russia – the west and the east of Europe – in accord with the true national interests of both parties.

This involves no formal agreement with the US (only its approval) because this is primarily a matter for Ukraine's two principal neighbours. Security Council approval will be required – but there should be no difficulty about that.

Obviously there must be no recognition for the Crimea 'government's' so-called referendum – clearly a sham. But there needs to be an all Ukraine referendum for any EU/Russia agreement, followed by the election of an all Ukraine government. These two votes to be internationally monitored and certified 'free and fair'.

We still do not know what Putin wants – just a better position in the Crimea; annexing the Crimea; annexing more of the eastern Ukraine (stopping where?); or the return of all Ukraine to Russian control? The threat of truly painful sanctions now could bring results: even the czars had to bend to powerful interests. The present self-imposed ‘Autocrat of all the Russia's cannot act without taking some account of Russia’s longer term interests: if really forceful sanctions are threatened, many of today’s powerful will be gravely concerned, including a great many of Russia’s very large well-educated citizens.

John Pedler, is a former British diplomat much involved with the USSR during the 'Cold War'. - dipconsult @ hotmail.com

Why States Still Use Barrel Bombs

Smoke ascends after a Syrian military helicopter allegedly dropped a barrel bomb over the city of Daraya on Jan. 31.(FADI DIRANI/AFP/Getty Images) Summary Barrel bombs are not especially effective weapons. They are often poorly constructed; they fail to detonate more often than other devices constructed for a similar purpose; and their lack of precision means they can have a disproportionate effect on civilian populations. However, combatants continue to use barrel bombs in conflicts, including in recent and ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, and they are ideally suited to the requirements of resource-poor states. Analysis Barrel bombs are improvised devices that contain explosive filling and shrapnel packed into a container, often in a cylindrical shape such as a barrel. The devices continue to be dropped on towns all over Syria . Indeed, there have been several documented cases of their use in Iraq over the past months, and residents of the city of Mosul, which was re

Russia Looks East for New Oil Markets

Click to Enlarge In the final years of the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began orienting his foreign policy toward Asia in response to a rising Japan. Putin has also piloted a much-touted pivot to Asia, coinciding with renewed U.S. interest in the area. A good expression of intent was Russia's hosting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2012 in Vladivostok, near Russia's borders with China and North Korea. Although its efforts in Asia have been limited by more direct interests in Russia's periphery and in Europe, Moscow recently has been able to look more to the east. Part of this renewed interest involves finding new export markets for Russian hydrocarbons. Russia's economy relies on energy exports, particularly crude oil and natural gas exported via pipeline to the West. However, Western Europe is diversifying its energy sources as new supplies come online out of a desire to reduce its dependence on Russian energy supplies . This has

LONDON POLICE INDIRECTLY ENCOURAGE CRIMINALS TO ATTACK RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC PROPERTY

ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGE A few days ago an unknown perpetrator trespassed on the territory of the Russian Trade Delegation in London, causing damage to the property and the vehicles belonging to the trade delegation , Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said during the September 12 press briefing. The diplomat revealed the response by the London police was discouraging. Police told that the case does not have any prospects and is likely to be closed. This was made despite the fact that the British law enforcement was provided with video surveillance tapes and detailed information shedding light on the incident. By this byehavior, British law inforcements indirectly encourage criminals to continue attacks on Russian diplomatic property in the UK. Zakharova’s statement on “Trespassing on the Russian Trade Mission premises in London” ( source ): During our briefings, we have repeatedly discussed compliance with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, specif

ISDEI Instituto de Seguridad, Defensa y Estudios Internacionales

Search This Blog