Skip to main content

In Cuba, Claims of U.S. Social Media Efforts Stoke Controversy



That the U.S. government manipulates social media as a part of its counterintelligence campaigns should surprise no one. However, allegations that emerged April 3 about a Cuban social media program funded by the U.S. Administration for International Development provide insight into the tactics Washington uses.

The Cuban government restricts public access to global communications. To circumvent the challenges of influencing a population isolated from the Internet, USAID partnered with a private contractor, Creative Associates International, to create a platform for sharing social information via text message. The ultimate goal, according to the report, was to slowly introduce anti-government political messaging to the service, called ZunZuneo, in an effort to generate momentum for public unrest outside of the mainstream Cuban democracy groups, which are largely ineffective. At its height, it managed to reach tens of thousands of Cubans sharing text messages with one another, in addition to messages planted by Creative Associates International and its partners.

Although the ZunZuneo effort collapsed -- apparently because of administrative challenges -- the broad outline of the effort is consistent with previous claims that have been made against the U.S. government and its sympathizers. One of the ultimate challenges facing governments throughout the world is how to handle the issues associated with ever-expanding communications networks. How governments handle them affects bilateral relations, as was the case in the Snowden affair, as well as the more nebulous world of propaganda.

Every government has its tried and true propaganda outlets, but the rise of social media has presented an opportunity for anonymous individuals, governments and even private companies to influence the global political conversation.

Social media is particularly powerful in shaping the dialogue of the global media elite. And while this dialogue is frequently confused for the actual opinions of the global public, it is much more isolated from street-level opinions than might be initially apparent. In many cases -- as in the so-called 2009 Green Revolution in Iran -- a social media campaign trumpeting change is much more effective at convincing international media that a revolution is coming than it is at actually generating political change. Frequently, social media is most effective at influencing the elite and middle classes of countries. In Venezuela, for example, the recent protests have largely been mobilized and reported through social media, given government controls on local media, but mostly they have served only to bring Venezuela's middle and upper classes into friendly geographic zones

These examples demonstrate that governments have lost some control of the messaging surrounding social issues and popular support. But real change happens when leaders lose legitimacy more broadly from powerful groups. For example, it was the Egyptian military's abandoning Hosni Mubarak that ultimately led him to step down. And in Ukraine, where social media may have been helpful in driving support for protests in central Kiev, it was ultimately the involvement of armed right-wing nationalists that forced former President Viktor Yanukovich to flee the country.

For its part, Cuba is not ready for another revolution, as has been demonstrated by the failure of decades of U.S. counterintelligence and covert operations designed to undermine the governments of Fidel and Raul Castro. The ultimate outcome of Thursday's revelations will likely be to stoke public concerns globally about U.S. interference in social media messaging. For Russia, this is particularly conveniently timed; Moscow has been pushing the line of U.S. interference in other countries' domestic uprisings since the mass protests in Moscow in 2011-2012 and in the more recent uprising in Kiev. The recent leaks of U.S. meddling via social media can help Moscow's next objective of discrediting the February overthrow of the government in Kiev.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why States Still Use Barrel Bombs

Smoke ascends after a Syrian military helicopter allegedly dropped a barrel bomb over the city of Daraya on Jan. 31.(FADI DIRANI/AFP/Getty Images) Summary Barrel bombs are not especially effective weapons. They are often poorly constructed; they fail to detonate more often than other devices constructed for a similar purpose; and their lack of precision means they can have a disproportionate effect on civilian populations. However, combatants continue to use barrel bombs in conflicts, including in recent and ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, and they are ideally suited to the requirements of resource-poor states. Analysis Barrel bombs are improvised devices that contain explosive filling and shrapnel packed into a container, often in a cylindrical shape such as a barrel. The devices continue to be dropped on towns all over Syria . Indeed, there have been several documented cases of their use in Iraq over the past months, and residents of the city of Mosul, which was re

Russia Looks East for New Oil Markets

Click to Enlarge In the final years of the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began orienting his foreign policy toward Asia in response to a rising Japan. Putin has also piloted a much-touted pivot to Asia, coinciding with renewed U.S. interest in the area. A good expression of intent was Russia's hosting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2012 in Vladivostok, near Russia's borders with China and North Korea. Although its efforts in Asia have been limited by more direct interests in Russia's periphery and in Europe, Moscow recently has been able to look more to the east. Part of this renewed interest involves finding new export markets for Russian hydrocarbons. Russia's economy relies on energy exports, particularly crude oil and natural gas exported via pipeline to the West. However, Western Europe is diversifying its energy sources as new supplies come online out of a desire to reduce its dependence on Russian energy supplies . This has

LONDON POLICE INDIRECTLY ENCOURAGE CRIMINALS TO ATTACK RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC PROPERTY

ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGE A few days ago an unknown perpetrator trespassed on the territory of the Russian Trade Delegation in London, causing damage to the property and the vehicles belonging to the trade delegation , Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said during the September 12 press briefing. The diplomat revealed the response by the London police was discouraging. Police told that the case does not have any prospects and is likely to be closed. This was made despite the fact that the British law enforcement was provided with video surveillance tapes and detailed information shedding light on the incident. By this byehavior, British law inforcements indirectly encourage criminals to continue attacks on Russian diplomatic property in the UK. Zakharova’s statement on “Trespassing on the Russian Trade Mission premises in London” ( source ): During our briefings, we have repeatedly discussed compliance with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, specif