Japan Promises to Follow Through with Africa Aid

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe speaks at the African Union headquarters in Addis Ababa on Jan. 14.(CARL DE SOUZA/AFP/Getty Images)

Analysis

Japan is highlighting its renewed investment in Africa even as China promises not to take a colonialist path in the region. Tokyo will "steadily" implement the $32 billion worth of aid and investment it has allotted to Africa over the next five years, Japanese Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida said during a meeting with African leaders in Cameroon on May 4. The $32 billion pledge, promised last year, marks an increase from Japan's $9 billion in aid to Africa between 2008 and 2012 -- a period that also saw a net decrease in Japan's direct investment in Africa.

Japan is attempting to revive its international standing and boost its economy through deeper engagement with developing countries around the world, especially those on whom it depends for resources. Despite the meeting in Cameroon, Japan's recent efforts have focused on East Africa, where the combination of natural gas discoveries, developing consumer markets, inroads into central Africa and access to the Indian Ocean has caught Tokyo's eye.

Japanese media may hope that the boost in aid to Africa does not get overshadowed by Chinese Premier Li Keqiang's visit to Ethiopia, Nigeria, Angola and Kenya, where China -- fast becoming one of the biggest investors in Africa -- has offered $10 billion in additional loans and $3 billion in additional aid, along with a wide range of business deals. China's large cash surpluses give it an advantage, but Japan differentiates itself with advanced human capital. In fact, the tendency to see China's and Japan's actions in Africa as a proxy struggle for influence is misleading; it elides the fact that Malaysia and India are also comparable Asian investors in Africa. Moreover, China will gradually face more financial constraints, and the rapidly growing presence of its companies and workers has stirred political tensions, causing Li to state that China does not seek to become a neo-colonialist power.

Comments

Why States Still Use Barrel Bombs

Smoke ascends after a Syrian military helicopter allegedly dropped a barrel bomb over the city of Daraya on Jan. 31.(FADI DIRANI/AFP/Getty Images) Summary Barrel bombs are not especially effective weapons. They are often poorly constructed; they fail to detonate more often than other devices constructed for a similar purpose; and their lack of precision means they can have a disproportionate effect on civilian populations. However, combatants continue to use barrel bombs in conflicts, including in recent and ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, and they are ideally suited to the requirements of resource-poor states. Analysis Barrel bombs are improvised devices that contain explosive filling and shrapnel packed into a container, often in a cylindrical shape such as a barrel. The devices continue to be dropped on towns all over Syria . Indeed, there have been several documented cases of their use in Iraq over the past months, and residents of the city of Mosul, which was re

Russia Looks East for New Oil Markets

Click to Enlarge In the final years of the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began orienting his foreign policy toward Asia in response to a rising Japan. Putin has also piloted a much-touted pivot to Asia, coinciding with renewed U.S. interest in the area. A good expression of intent was Russia's hosting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2012 in Vladivostok, near Russia's borders with China and North Korea. Although its efforts in Asia have been limited by more direct interests in Russia's periphery and in Europe, Moscow recently has been able to look more to the east. Part of this renewed interest involves finding new export markets for Russian hydrocarbons. Russia's economy relies on energy exports, particularly crude oil and natural gas exported via pipeline to the West. However, Western Europe is diversifying its energy sources as new supplies come online out of a desire to reduce its dependence on Russian energy supplies . This has

LONDON POLICE INDIRECTLY ENCOURAGE CRIMINALS TO ATTACK RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC PROPERTY

ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGE A few days ago an unknown perpetrator trespassed on the territory of the Russian Trade Delegation in London, causing damage to the property and the vehicles belonging to the trade delegation , Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said during the September 12 press briefing. The diplomat revealed the response by the London police was discouraging. Police told that the case does not have any prospects and is likely to be closed. This was made despite the fact that the British law enforcement was provided with video surveillance tapes and detailed information shedding light on the incident. By this byehavior, British law inforcements indirectly encourage criminals to continue attacks on Russian diplomatic property in the UK. Zakharova’s statement on “Trespassing on the Russian Trade Mission premises in London” ( source ): During our briefings, we have repeatedly discussed compliance with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, specif

ISDEI Instituto de Seguridad, Defensa y Estudios Internacionales

Search This Blog