Skip to main content

‘Islamophobia, EU criticism - two pillars of populism and extremism in Germany’



Participants hold up their mobile phones during a demonstration called by anti-immigration group PEGIDA, a German abbreviation for "Patriotic Europeans against the Islamization of the West", in Dresden December 8, 2014. (Reuters/Hannibal Hanschke)




Islamophobia we see now in Germany has nothing to do with classical neo-Nazi ideology, it is partly fueled by right-wing extremists and populists who impose on the locals the idea of a threat coming from Muslims, Daniel Koehler from EXIT-Germany told RT.

German police have established there is a considerable rise in far-right extremism and violence against foreigners in Germany. The attacks seem to be a backlash against the sharp increase in the number of refugees arriving in Germany. It remains the strongest EU economy and attracts thousands of migrants and asylum-seekers. At the same time the Muslim community in Germany is sounding the alarm over rising Islamophobia in the country.

RT: The migrants themselves say Germany is a great country to come to as there are lots of options for education and government support. But is that the kind of help actually fuelling attacks on migrants?

Daniel Koehler: I don’t think that this actually is fueling hate against immigrants. Germany has a long tradition of a rather large hardcore of military neo-Nazis and what we have seen in the last couple of years is a particular kind of Islamophobia that has been fueled in part by right-wing extremists and populist parties in Germany. So it is a combination of what is there in terms of a general sentiment against particular Muslim immigrants, and then what we’ve seen in the global political area with the war against Islamic State, the Syrian conflict, the foreign fighter issue that basically fits back into the fear and feeling in a large part of the German population that Muslims are essentially a threat to German society.

RT: Why there is such hatred towards migrants, especially Muslims? Do Germans see them as a potential threat?

DK: A large part of the population in Germany knows that many European countries have experienced terrorist attacks from Al-Qaeda and Al-Qaeda affiliated groups. So far nothing of this has happened in Germany, there were a couple of attempts of Islamist terrorist attacks but not successful. With a growing perception of groups like Islamic State and al-Qaeda, Germans feel basically that sooner or later this will swap back to Germany and there will be a terrorist attack or something like that.

RT: The anti-EU Alternative for Germany party supports anti-Islamic ideology and those who rally against Islam and its gaining popularity all the time. Are more Germans ready to back the far-right again, despite all that happened in the 20th century?




German riot police officers face protesters during a demonstration by neo-Nazis and self-styled soccer hooligans against ultra-conservative Islamic Salafists in Hanover November 15, 2014. (Reuters/Fabrizio Bensch)



DK: We are used to the classical neo-Nazi national socialist kind of groups with a strong base of anti-Semitism. This is something that is really far away from these groups that are now working. Although this is overlapping and they are neo-Nazis and right-wing extremists working in these mass rallies or even in the anti-EU groups, but basically the basis for them to rally voters and support is against the EU and against Islam. So Islamophobia and EU criticism are the basic two new pillars of fragmented populism and even extremism in Germany. It doesn’t feel like it is related to WWII and National Socialism, although there are of course ideological strains that come from this ideology as well, but people don’t perceive it as such, they think that Islamophobia, against the EU, and against Muslims is something entirely different.

RT: Do you think mass immigration is basically benefitting or harming Germany’s economy?

DK: We know from recent studies that immigration economically speaking is a huge success for Germany. We know that billions of euro profit Germany due to immigrants that work in Germany integrate in Germany and pay taxes. So we know that economically speaking we benefit from immigration but this is really a problem as in many other states like France, Norway, and Sweden. There are basically two levels: there are these hard-working individuals, people that seek help and safety from torture and war, they have a human right to get asylum and then you have a larger scale - politics. These mass rallies that are held in less than a couple of months are usually in geographical areas where really there are not so many immigrants and this is not a huge topic in these areas. So the individuals that are in Germany, they are made to become tools of a larger political struggle, they are instrumentalized by far-right groups to fuel hatred against immigration. The toughest thing is that these people that come here from war zones have nothing left and try to rebuild their lives; they almost never can do anything about it. They are just chess pieces in a larger chess game actually.

RT: Is there any peaceful ways to solve this conflict between the locals and migrants?

DK: There are many ways for a peaceful conflict solution. First of all, communication is the most important. You have to include the local population when, for example, an asylum seeker hostel or any refugee home is opened in a local vicinity. You cannot decide this over the heads of the people; you have to explain human rights and democratic principles on which Germany is built, and why we help people that come from war zones seeking help. And we basically economically benefit from them. There is a lack of communication which is used and instrumentalized by far-right groups that basically say “Listen, your local politicians basically don’t talk to you, they ignore your political will. We are the only ones listening to you,” and they come with falsified statistics about rising crime, drug problems, lack of integration which is untrue. But there is a great lack of communication and politicians need to include the local population, need to explain democratic values and principles better.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why States Still Use Barrel Bombs

Smoke ascends after a Syrian military helicopter allegedly dropped a barrel bomb over the city of Daraya on Jan. 31.(FADI DIRANI/AFP/Getty Images)

Summary
Barrel bombs are not especially effective weapons. They are often poorly constructed; they fail to detonate more often than other devices constructed for a similar purpose; and their lack of precision means they can have a disproportionate effect on civilian populations.

However, combatants continue to use barrel bombs in conflicts, including in recent and ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, and they are ideally suited to the requirements of resource-poor states.

Analysis


Barrel bombs are improvised devices that contain explosive filling and shrapnel packed into a container, often in a cylindrical shape such as a barrel. The devices continue to be dropped on towns all over Syria. Indeed, there have been several documented cases of their use in Iraq over the past months, and residents of the city of Mosul, which was recently …

Russia Looks East for New Oil Markets

Click to Enlarge


In the final years of the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began orienting his foreign policy toward Asia in response to a rising Japan. Putin has also piloted a much-touted pivot to Asia, coinciding with renewed U.S. interest in the area. A good expression of intent was Russia's hosting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2012 in Vladivostok, near Russia's borders with China and North Korea. Although its efforts in Asia have been limited by more direct interests in Russia's periphery and in Europe, Moscow recently has been able to look more to the east.

Part of this renewed interest involves finding new export markets for Russian hydrocarbons. Russia's economy relies on energy exports, particularly crude oil and natural gas exported via pipeline to the West. However, Western Europe is diversifying its energy sources as new supplies come online out of a desire to reduce its dependence on Russian energy supplies.

This has forced…

In Yemen, a Rebel Advance Could Topple the Regime

Shia loyal to the al-Houthi movement ride past Yemeni soldiers near Yaz, Yemen, in May. (MOHAMMED HUWAIS/AFP/Getty Images)

Summary


The success of a rebel campaign in northern Yemen is threatening to destabilize the already weak and overwhelmed government in Sanaa. After capturing the city of Amran, a mere 50 kilometers (30 miles) from the capital, in early July, the rebels from the al-Houthi tribe are in their strongest position yet. The Yemeni government is developing plans to divide the country into six federal regions, and the rebels believe this is their chance to claim territory for the future bargaining.

The central government is nearly powerless to fend off the rebels; its forces are already stretched thin. Neighboring Saudi Arabia has intervened in Yemen before and still supports Sunni tribes in the north, but the risk of inciting a Shiite backlash or creating space for jihadists to move in could deter another intervention.

Analysis


Followers of Zaidi Islam, a branch of Shiism, rul…