Skip to main content

Destabilization of Afghanistan, Bosnia, Libya, Iraq and Syria: Terrorist Networks and Tripartite of Forces

In the 1980s and early 1990s the mantra was holy warriors in Afghanistan against the evil Soviet Union. Of course, not much was holy about these Takfiri Islamist sectarian warriors because soon they would slaughter the Shia, enslave women, support killing homosexuals, threaten to kill all apostates, whip women if not fully covered up and a host of other evils. The logical conclusion was an international jihadist network that was brought together with the help of the CIA, MI6, ISI and other interested parties in the Gulf region.

Of course, once this barbaric year zero Takfiri Islamist reality came into being in Afghanistan then the end result was opium,, backwardness, terrorism, enforcement of women into the shadows of society and so many other brutal realities. Yet, the usual Western and Gulf powers – supported by Turkey and Pakistan in several conflicts depending on geopolitics, would continue to destabilize in Iraq, Libya and Syria. In other words, the madness created by the usual players was now much more potent because a new year zero Takfiri agenda would materialize.

Following the Afghanistan debacle the international jihadist brigade, NATO powers and various Muslim dominated nations were all working together in Bosnia. Therefore, the mass media; international political leaders; various destabilization covert organizations like the CIA, MIT, BND, MI6, and ISI; international jihadists; Gulf Petrodollars; Iran; and so forth; all worked on the same side against the mainly Orthodox Christian Serbs of Bosnia. Of course, not content with this then Kosovo would loom large from the ashes of the need to punish Orthodox Christians – just like the abandonment of Northern Cyprus to Turkey.

The Bosnian Muslim international jihadi network would immediately play its part in international terrorism. Two prime examples being the terrorist outrages of Madrid and September 11. After all, the natural linkage between the intrigues of major Western powers, Muslim nations and international jihadists in Bosnia and Kosovo was clear for all to see. Therefore, Orthodox Christian Serbs became a convenient tool of hatred for the enemies of Serbia, in order to fulfill geopolitical end games for the usual tripartite players of destabilization.

Modern Tokyo Times in another article states: “Abu Zubair al-Haili (Mohammed Haydar Zammar) entered Bosnia in order to kill Orthodox Christians and clearly this individual, like countless others, was given the Bill Clinton “Green Light” to enter Bosnia. Abu Zubair al-Haili was instrumental in the Hamburg al-Qaeda cell that helped the September 11 network to flourish. He further developed his skills in terrorism and hatred towards non-Muslims in Bosnia that was fertile ground because of the Bill Clinton administration.”

Modern Tokyo Times continued by stating: “Abu Zubair al-Haili was also instrumental in bringing Mohammed Atta into the al-Qaeda network. Clearly, the actions of Abu Zubair al-Haili in Bosnia gave him further credentials. Mohammed (Mohamed) Atta rewarded America’s support of Islamic terrorist networks from “a convenient distance” by blowing up the World Trade Center.”

The same source comments: “American Airlines Flight 77 also had a powerful Bosnian connection because two Islamists on board had also gone to Bosnia to kill Orthodox Christians. Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon but of course very few questions were raised about these Islamists being on the same side of America under Bill Clinton. However, Nawaf Alhazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar had served in Bosnia. Also, coming from the land of “institutional religious hatred,” Saudi Arabia, then clearly killing infidels would have been ingrained within the House of War theory.”

Iraq would soon become the next card in the destabilization of deemed enemies. Of course, September 11 and ratlines linking Saudi Arabia and Gulf petrodollars were conveniently brushed under the carpet by America. Therefore, the overthrow of Saddam Hussein was followed by the destabilization of this nation whereby today this country is a failed state. Indeed, not only is Iraq a failed state but the terrorist and sectarian shadow in this nation was given fresh impetus by the destabilization of Syria by NATO and Gulf powers. This reality means that Iraq is once more suffering because of the brutal chess board designs by the tripartite of brutal forces against independent Syria. After all, tripartite forces follow logically in the wake of fresh conspiracies against independent states.

Currently it is Syria’s turn to witness mass terrorism, sectarianism, the support of various terrorist groups by Gulf and NATO powers – the destruction of the economy – and the desire to create another failed state. Prior to Syria, it was the turn of Libya to suffer the tripartite intrigues of the usual players whereby many brutal massacres occurred. Like usual, after the original endgame was completed then the terrorist and failed state syndrome would follow naturally. Therefore, modern day Libya is in crisis and gripped by various terrorist proxies of outside forces alongside the usual year zero Takfiri forces of hatred.

Amazingly, Syria is still surviving the collective onslaught of tripartite forces against this independent nation state. However, the price is enormous because vast numbers have been killed and clearly the death toll will continue to rise based on outside meddling and the role of Gulf petrodollars. Despite this, currently Syria is bravely trying to halt the destabilization of nation states by the tripartite of forces that follow each other naturally.


Popular posts from this blog

Why States Still Use Barrel Bombs

Smoke ascends after a Syrian military helicopter allegedly dropped a barrel bomb over the city of Daraya on Jan. 31.(FADI DIRANI/AFP/Getty Images)

Barrel bombs are not especially effective weapons. They are often poorly constructed; they fail to detonate more often than other devices constructed for a similar purpose; and their lack of precision means they can have a disproportionate effect on civilian populations.

However, combatants continue to use barrel bombs in conflicts, including in recent and ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, and they are ideally suited to the requirements of resource-poor states.


Barrel bombs are improvised devices that contain explosive filling and shrapnel packed into a container, often in a cylindrical shape such as a barrel. The devices continue to be dropped on towns all over Syria. Indeed, there have been several documented cases of their use in Iraq over the past months, and residents of the city of Mosul, which was recently …

Russia Looks East for New Oil Markets

Click to Enlarge

In the final years of the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began orienting his foreign policy toward Asia in response to a rising Japan. Putin has also piloted a much-touted pivot to Asia, coinciding with renewed U.S. interest in the area. A good expression of intent was Russia's hosting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2012 in Vladivostok, near Russia's borders with China and North Korea. Although its efforts in Asia have been limited by more direct interests in Russia's periphery and in Europe, Moscow recently has been able to look more to the east.

Part of this renewed interest involves finding new export markets for Russian hydrocarbons. Russia's economy relies on energy exports, particularly crude oil and natural gas exported via pipeline to the West. However, Western Europe is diversifying its energy sources as new supplies come online out of a desire to reduce its dependence on Russian energy supplies.

This has forced…

In Yemen, a Rebel Advance Could Topple the Regime

Shia loyal to the al-Houthi movement ride past Yemeni soldiers near Yaz, Yemen, in May. (MOHAMMED HUWAIS/AFP/Getty Images)


The success of a rebel campaign in northern Yemen is threatening to destabilize the already weak and overwhelmed government in Sanaa. After capturing the city of Amran, a mere 50 kilometers (30 miles) from the capital, in early July, the rebels from the al-Houthi tribe are in their strongest position yet. The Yemeni government is developing plans to divide the country into six federal regions, and the rebels believe this is their chance to claim territory for the future bargaining.

The central government is nearly powerless to fend off the rebels; its forces are already stretched thin. Neighboring Saudi Arabia has intervened in Yemen before and still supports Sunni tribes in the north, but the risk of inciting a Shiite backlash or creating space for jihadists to move in could deter another intervention.


Followers of Zaidi Islam, a branch of Shiism, rul…