Skip to main content

China Begins Weaponizing its Man-made Islands as Tensions Grow



The Chinese regime has moved armaments to its man-made islands in the South China Sea, as tensions with neighboring countries and the United States intensify.

The exact type of weapons deployed were not specified in an exclusive report from Australian news agency The Sydney Morning Herald. It states, however, that Australian officials are worried that China will follow up by deploying long-range radar and anti-aircraft batteries.

In the Chinese Communist Party’s newly released military strategy, it shifted the air defense policy of its air force to allow for offensive actions.

The Australian report states that discussions around the weapons deployments “are prompting discussions in senior military circles” that may lead Australia to begin sending its air force to the South China Sea for “freedom of navigation” missions “to demonstrate that Canberra does not accept Beijing’s hardening claims.”

Missions could include fly-throughs, sail-throughs, and similar exercises alongside the forces of other nations.

The discussions in Australia follow a new policy from the United States to directly challenge the Chinese regime’s land-grab in the South China Sea.

The Chinese regime is building artificial islands in the waters close to 1,300 miles from the Chinese mainland. While it has not officially declared a defensive region around the islands, its military has been warning other nations when they pass through.

On May 20, the U.S. military released audio and video of the types of threats the Chinese regime sends. It flew a P8-A Poseidon surveillance aircraft over one of the Chinese man-made islands. A Chinese voice over the radio gives eight warnings, including “You are approaching our military alert zone,” “Leave immediately!,” and “You go!”

The United States made its intentions for the flyover clear. It is to maintain freedom of navigation, and to make clear that the Chinese regime’s construction of new territory in international waters will not be recognized as a legitimate claim to sovereignty over the region.

After the U.S. flyover, the Philippines stated that they too would begin flying military planes over the region. Australia may now follow suit.



The Chinese regime has made clear its ambitions for expansion. Facing this threat, according to Richard Fisher, a senior fellow at the International Assessment and Strategy Center, the United States has a small window of time to act.

“We are entering into a battle of perceptions, and we are attempting to add new layers on the argument that it is China that is the aggressor, the rule breaker, and the real threat to the region,” Fisher said.

He added, however, that unless the United States is willing to put more muscle behind its pushback, “the Chinese are going to continue to ignore us, continue to build more bases, and continue to build control of this region when they have the means to do so.”

The Chinese regime is using a three-pronged strategy as it pushes abroad. It uses military to seize and defend territory, propaganda to justify its actions, and money to rope in business leaders, and politicians to influence foreign policy.

It outlined its ambitions for expansion in the Chinese Military Strategy white paper released on May 26 by the Chinese Ministry of National Defense. The report outlines the Chinese regime’s interests in expanding its global influence, reeling in Taiwan, and expanding military control of the South China Sea and East China Sea.

“This is the chain of events that we should be working on stopping now,” Fisher said.

Fisher noted the Chinese regime has sent between 200 and 300 ships to the South China Sea for the construction of artificial islands for military bases. “In most places that would be considered an invasion,” he said. “The United States should be responding as if China started invading the South China Sea.”

The Chinese regime’s ambitions for military expansion aren’t limited to just the South China Sea. It is currently looking to build military bases elsewhere, including in Djibouti in northeastern Africa, and in Namibia in southwest Africa.

Reports published by Chinese media in November 2014 state the Chinese regime is trying to build 20 naval bases around the world, including in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Burma, Djibouti, Yemen, Oman, Kenya, Tanzania, Mozambique, Seychelles, Madagascar, North Korea, Papua New Guinea, Cambodia, Thailand, Bangladesh, Maldives, Nigeria, and Angola.

According to The Namibian, a report on the bases published in the Chinese newspaper International Herald Leader states the bases will give the Chinese military “three strategic lines” in the northern Indian Ocean, western Indian Ocean, and South Indian Ocean.

Fisher noted that when the Chinese regime’s military and business ties are taken into account, it could also soon have influence over major trade chokepoints in Central America, South America, the South Atlantic, and in the South China Sea.

“There is a lot more to be done,” Fisher said, in relation to the current U.S. response. “We’re in a period where there is very little time left.”


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why States Still Use Barrel Bombs

Smoke ascends after a Syrian military helicopter allegedly dropped a barrel bomb over the city of Daraya on Jan. 31.(FADI DIRANI/AFP/Getty Images) Summary Barrel bombs are not especially effective weapons. They are often poorly constructed; they fail to detonate more often than other devices constructed for a similar purpose; and their lack of precision means they can have a disproportionate effect on civilian populations. However, combatants continue to use barrel bombs in conflicts, including in recent and ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, and they are ideally suited to the requirements of resource-poor states. Analysis Barrel bombs are improvised devices that contain explosive filling and shrapnel packed into a container, often in a cylindrical shape such as a barrel. The devices continue to be dropped on towns all over Syria . Indeed, there have been several documented cases of their use in Iraq over the past months, and residents of the city of Mosul, which was re

Russia Looks East for New Oil Markets

Click to Enlarge In the final years of the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began orienting his foreign policy toward Asia in response to a rising Japan. Putin has also piloted a much-touted pivot to Asia, coinciding with renewed U.S. interest in the area. A good expression of intent was Russia's hosting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2012 in Vladivostok, near Russia's borders with China and North Korea. Although its efforts in Asia have been limited by more direct interests in Russia's periphery and in Europe, Moscow recently has been able to look more to the east. Part of this renewed interest involves finding new export markets for Russian hydrocarbons. Russia's economy relies on energy exports, particularly crude oil and natural gas exported via pipeline to the West. However, Western Europe is diversifying its energy sources as new supplies come online out of a desire to reduce its dependence on Russian energy supplies . This has

LONDON POLICE INDIRECTLY ENCOURAGE CRIMINALS TO ATTACK RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC PROPERTY

ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGE A few days ago an unknown perpetrator trespassed on the territory of the Russian Trade Delegation in London, causing damage to the property and the vehicles belonging to the trade delegation , Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said during the September 12 press briefing. The diplomat revealed the response by the London police was discouraging. Police told that the case does not have any prospects and is likely to be closed. This was made despite the fact that the British law enforcement was provided with video surveillance tapes and detailed information shedding light on the incident. By this byehavior, British law inforcements indirectly encourage criminals to continue attacks on Russian diplomatic property in the UK. Zakharova’s statement on “Trespassing on the Russian Trade Mission premises in London” ( source ): During our briefings, we have repeatedly discussed compliance with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, specif