Skip to main content

Defense officials question U.S. tech companies’ ties to Chinese military as potential harm to national security








Members of the U.S. defense and national security communities are increasing questioning ties between technology giants including Microsoft, IBM, Cisco Systems and the Chinese military, sharing concerns that joint project development could be endangering national security, The New York Times reported.

“One Chinese technology company receives crucial technical guidance from a former People’s Liberation Army rear admiral. Another company developed the electronics on China’s first atomic bomb. A third sells technology to China’s air-to-air missile research academy,” the Times reported.



“Their ties to the Chinese military run deep, and they all have something else in common: Each Chinese company counts one of America’s tech giants — IBM, Cisco Systems or Microsoft — as a partner.”

Those ties are not well publicized, but they are nevertheless serve as the crux of a growing debate among defense and national security officials, including many former U.S. military officials, analysts and others.

The cross-border partnerships – where American companies license, jointly develop or share advanced technologies with Chinese counterparts – are lucrative to U.S. tech firms, security experts are becoming concerned that the deals are imperiling national security.

The Times notes that many of the shared capabilities are commercial in nature, but they have nevertheless become more critical to defense. Many believe this sharing is enabling China to fundamentally bolster its technological capabilities in a way that is assisting Beijing’s military research and operations.

A report that was released publicly last week from a security firm with long ties to the Pentagon – Defense Group Inc. – noted that IBM’s partnerships in China, part of a global effort by the company called Open Power, have already harmed U.S. national security.


“IBM is endangering the national and economic security of the United States, risking the cybersecurity of their customers globally, and undermining decades of U.S. nonproliferation policies regarding high-performance computing,” the report said.

The Times reported that an IBM spokesman rejected the report’s conclusions, but other security experts agreed with its findings and defended the firm.

Founded by former Defense Department official James P. Wade in 1987, Defense Group Inc. is known to be tough on China. However, it is used by the U.S. government to produce classified military intelligence and analysis and works with other groups including the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, a panel that looks at the implications for national security in trade between the U.S. and China.

“We need to pay more attention to the judgments on whether advanced technology should be sold,” Adm. Dennis C. Blair, who was the United States director of national intelligence from 2009 to 2010 and who headed the Pacific Command, told the Times. “If you don’t pay attention, you can have damage to your national security.”

He went on to say that generally speaking it is U.S. policy that companies should be able to sell technology that is generally available on the world market but that advanced technology which can be converted to military use should be prohibited. Blair thinks that government agencies in charge of managing foreign acquisition of technology should be beefed up.

The Times reported that there is no evidence to suggest that U.S. tech companies have broken any laws. Still, recent reviews of technology deals have indicated that, on two separate occasions, tech transfers could harm national security:

— “In February, the Department of Commerce said that four supercomputer sites in China receiving chips from Intel through its Chinese partner, Inspur, “have been involved in activities contrary to the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States.” Intel has said it stopped selling the chips in China and that it was in compliance with United States law.

— “In May, the United States Navy also said that it needed new server computers for one of its systems after the server provider, IBM, sold the computing unit to the Chinese company Lenovo. IBM said the sale had passed the United States government’s review.”

The paper said that in recent years China has been pushing American tech companies for closer ties. During his visit to the U.S. in September, Chinese President Xi Jinping met Microsoft founder and CEO Bill Gates in Washington State.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why States Still Use Barrel Bombs

Smoke ascends after a Syrian military helicopter allegedly dropped a barrel bomb over the city of Daraya on Jan. 31.(FADI DIRANI/AFP/Getty Images) Summary Barrel bombs are not especially effective weapons. They are often poorly constructed; they fail to detonate more often than other devices constructed for a similar purpose; and their lack of precision means they can have a disproportionate effect on civilian populations. However, combatants continue to use barrel bombs in conflicts, including in recent and ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, and they are ideally suited to the requirements of resource-poor states. Analysis Barrel bombs are improvised devices that contain explosive filling and shrapnel packed into a container, often in a cylindrical shape such as a barrel. The devices continue to be dropped on towns all over Syria . Indeed, there have been several documented cases of their use in Iraq over the past months, and residents of the city of Mosul, which was re

Russia Looks East for New Oil Markets

Click to Enlarge In the final years of the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began orienting his foreign policy toward Asia in response to a rising Japan. Putin has also piloted a much-touted pivot to Asia, coinciding with renewed U.S. interest in the area. A good expression of intent was Russia's hosting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2012 in Vladivostok, near Russia's borders with China and North Korea. Although its efforts in Asia have been limited by more direct interests in Russia's periphery and in Europe, Moscow recently has been able to look more to the east. Part of this renewed interest involves finding new export markets for Russian hydrocarbons. Russia's economy relies on energy exports, particularly crude oil and natural gas exported via pipeline to the West. However, Western Europe is diversifying its energy sources as new supplies come online out of a desire to reduce its dependence on Russian energy supplies . This has

LONDON POLICE INDIRECTLY ENCOURAGE CRIMINALS TO ATTACK RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC PROPERTY

ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGE A few days ago an unknown perpetrator trespassed on the territory of the Russian Trade Delegation in London, causing damage to the property and the vehicles belonging to the trade delegation , Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said during the September 12 press briefing. The diplomat revealed the response by the London police was discouraging. Police told that the case does not have any prospects and is likely to be closed. This was made despite the fact that the British law enforcement was provided with video surveillance tapes and detailed information shedding light on the incident. By this byehavior, British law inforcements indirectly encourage criminals to continue attacks on Russian diplomatic property in the UK. Zakharova’s statement on “Trespassing on the Russian Trade Mission premises in London” ( source ): During our briefings, we have repeatedly discussed compliance with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, specif