‘US war in Afghanistan goes on, but renamed’

The US government has only officially renamed certain tasks in Afghanistan trying to avoid responsibility for its actions and confuse the American people, but that doesn’t change the character of the war, says Sara Flounders of the International Action Center.

Afghan troops have pushed Taliban militants out of the northern Darqad district as the security situation in the south of the country deteriorates. The Taliban is fighting government troops in Afghanistan's largest province Helmand, after militants seized vast parts of it last month.

British and US elite forces were sent in to help the Afghans stop the advance. Last week a joint Afghan-US special operation saw an American soldier killed and two more wounded in Helmand province.

When asked about the casualties, Pentagon Press Secretary Peter Cook stopped short of calling the incident part of a“combat” mission.

Speaking on Thursday, Cook said the Department of Defense may not always know what US troops deployed in Afghanistan had been tasked with doing.

RT: What is your opinion on the recent Cook statement?

Sara Flounders: What it really means I think that they don’t want the people here in the US to know what US soldiers in Afghanistan are tasked with doing. That is how I would interpret it. Although of course it is true that in a war situation, which these soldiers are clearly in a war situation, you don’t know what they are doing from minute to minute. But they are doing a lot more than training and advising; that is just a renaming of their task. The US is very definitely involved now in 15 years of war in Afghanistan, and Afghanistan remains the poorest country in the world today after those years and years of billions of dollars pumped in for war.

RT: Does this training and advice mission imply allied troops are operating under Afghan command?

SF: They are supposedly under Afghan command. What the Afghan command really is – it is the US command. Again that is one more way in which this whole war is being renamed for public purposes, but clearly this is a US war and none of these Afghan commanders could last a day without US troops and also, tens of thousands of US contractors, subcontractor and mercenaries. Obama claims he left 10,000, I think 9,600 US troops in Afghanistan, but the Department of Defense as hired another 39,000 contractors and mercenaries. And then there are about 5,000 NATO forces that are not US forces. So there are tens of thousands of troops under US command nominally called Afghan command in what is a US war.

RT: A US soldier was killed in combat recently. Is the Pentagon trying to avoid responsibility here, saying it may not know what US troops are doing?

SF: Very much so. It is trying to avoid responsibility on every level, and trying to confuse and confound people here in the US to make it seem that the US is withdrawing troops – it has not done so. As I say they really have been just renamed, reassigned, officially given different tasks, but it hasn’t changed the character of the war. And there are between contractors, NATO forces and US troops – still 50,000 forces in the area on top of the tens of thousands of Afghan troops.

RT: At the briefing, the spokesman repeatedly described the incident as a combat "situation". Why this choice of language?

SF: There is very much a major military offensive going on in Helmand Province, where this death took place – I think more than 80 percent of the poppy opium trade is in that province. So there are a lot of corrupt Afghan officials, and I think US officials and others who have a big stake in what happens in Helmand Province and are very much involved in the war and in trying to secure this very lucrative area. They want to keep it under their control, their hands, and those profits in their hands. This is part of this dirty war, because what the same military spokespeople are not saying while they talk about one US death is that Afghanistan today has the highest rate of infant mortality, of women’s mortality in child birth, and one of the lowest rates of literacy in the world. Those are the counts that we don’t hear, and we should.

RT: Barack Obama has been announcing the end of the combat mission in Afghanistan for three years now. So how would he explain the killing of a Special Forces soldier? Do you see an end?

SF: ... President Obama promised to end US wars abroad and clearly that hasn’t happened, it’s escalated, and the war in Afghanistan grinds on and on much to the detriment to the people of Afghanistan along with the deaths of US soldiers, the deaths of contractors, but overwhelmingly the deaths among the Afghan people, especially the civilians. And the targets have been everything from the hospitals to tanks.

Why States Still Use Barrel Bombs

Smoke ascends after a Syrian military helicopter allegedly dropped a barrel bomb over the city of Daraya on Jan. 31.(FADI DIRANI/AFP/Getty Images) Summary Barrel bombs are not especially effective weapons. They are often poorly constructed; they fail to detonate more often than other devices constructed for a similar purpose; and their lack of precision means they can have a disproportionate effect on civilian populations. However, combatants continue to use barrel bombs in conflicts, including in recent and ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, and they are ideally suited to the requirements of resource-poor states. Analysis Barrel bombs are improvised devices that contain explosive filling and shrapnel packed into a container, often in a cylindrical shape such as a barrel. The devices continue to be dropped on towns all over Syria . Indeed, there have been several documented cases of their use in Iraq over the past months, and residents of the city of Mosul, which was re

Russia Looks East for New Oil Markets

Click to Enlarge In the final years of the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began orienting his foreign policy toward Asia in response to a rising Japan. Putin has also piloted a much-touted pivot to Asia, coinciding with renewed U.S. interest in the area. A good expression of intent was Russia's hosting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2012 in Vladivostok, near Russia's borders with China and North Korea. Although its efforts in Asia have been limited by more direct interests in Russia's periphery and in Europe, Moscow recently has been able to look more to the east. Part of this renewed interest involves finding new export markets for Russian hydrocarbons. Russia's economy relies on energy exports, particularly crude oil and natural gas exported via pipeline to the West. However, Western Europe is diversifying its energy sources as new supplies come online out of a desire to reduce its dependence on Russian energy supplies . This has

LONDON POLICE INDIRECTLY ENCOURAGE CRIMINALS TO ATTACK RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC PROPERTY

ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGE A few days ago an unknown perpetrator trespassed on the territory of the Russian Trade Delegation in London, causing damage to the property and the vehicles belonging to the trade delegation , Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said during the September 12 press briefing. The diplomat revealed the response by the London police was discouraging. Police told that the case does not have any prospects and is likely to be closed. This was made despite the fact that the British law enforcement was provided with video surveillance tapes and detailed information shedding light on the incident. By this byehavior, British law inforcements indirectly encourage criminals to continue attacks on Russian diplomatic property in the UK. Zakharova’s statement on “Trespassing on the Russian Trade Mission premises in London” ( source ): During our briefings, we have repeatedly discussed compliance with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, specif

ISDEI Instituto de Seguridad, Defensa y Estudios Internacionales

Search This Blog