Skip to main content


The usage of the GBU-43 Massive Ordnance Air Blast was another attempt of the Donald Trump’s administration to use force as a tool for solving political problems.


On Thursday, the US for the first time used its most powerful non-nuclear bomb in combat conditions, targeting terrorists of the Islamic State (IS) group. Reportedly, the GBU-43 Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB), also known as the ‘Mother Of All Bombs’, was dropped by the MC-130 aircraft on IS terrorists and their system of tunnels in Achin district in the Afghan province of Nangarhar.

According to the latest report of the AFP news agency, over 90 terrorists of the IS were killed in the aerial attack. “At least 92 IS militants were killed in the bombing,” head of Achin district of Nangarhar province, Ismail Shinwari, told the news agency.

At the same time, the Tolo News TV-channel reported, citing the Afghan authorities, that at least four ringleaders of the local IS cell were killed in the US airstrike. According to the TV-channel, 94 terrorists, including four local IS commanders, were eliminated in the bombardment.

Reportedly, the Afghan Defense Ministry confirmed the data on the killing of 94 militants and local IS leaders, noting that the terrorists’ system of tunnels was destroyed. The Defense Ministry also added that civilians did not suffer in the attack. “There were 22 people in the first protective construction, 62 [militants] were in the second tunnel, in the third – 10 [terrorists], in total, 94 IS militants were killed,” the statement reads.

Tolo News also reported that a ground operation was launched in the district after the Thursday’s strike.

Meanwhile, the Amaq news agency, affiliated to the IS, reported that the terrorist group denied the information that it suffered casualties in the US airstrike.

According to data from open sources, the weight of the GBU-43 high-explosive aerial bomb is 9.5 tons. An explosive mixture of hexogen, tritol and aluminum powder is used in the bomb. The GBU-43 is equipped with a satellite guidance system. The first test of the bomb was conducted in 2003. As it is claimed, in total, there are 15 such munitions on the US arsenal.

US President Donald Trump called the strike “a very successful mission” of the US Armed Forces.

Meanwhile, on Saturday, former Afghan President Hamid Karzai said that the usage of the US superpowerful bomb against IS terrorists had been planned in advance, and the presence of militants was only a pretext for testing this weapon. As Tolo News reported, Karzai said that the bombing had been pre-planned and was a test of the weapon of mass destruction. He also stressed that the US used the IS as a pretext for their actions, as well as criticized the country’s current government that allowed it to be done. “If the government approved this, this action can be called a betrayal,” the TV-channel quoted his words.

According to a political scientist and deputy director of the National Institute for the Development of Contemporary Ideology, Igor Shatrov, the US becomes prone to “spectacular gestures.”

“In fact, it really was a bomb’s test, as it was its first combat use. In this regard, we have seen a certain position, a certain new feature of Trump. He is inclined to spectacular, ‘beautiful’ gestures with usage of the armed forces. Note, this demarche with the deployment of a naval group in the direction of North Korea or the bomb’s dropping – not the result, but the picture is important to him. And it seems to me that we will see many such spectacular, but dangerous gestures during the reign of Trump. The US has shown that is has the most powerful weapons, it has been emphasized that it was a powerful non-nuclear bomb – of course, it is a signal to the whole world and to Russia in particular. All this is called to ‘brandish the arms’,” Shatrov said on the air of the Sputnik broadcasting station.

According to him, the strike with the ‘Mother Of All Bombs’ was specially carried out on the eve of the international conference on Afghanistan, which will be held in Moscow.

“The US shows that it is prone to solve problems by military, but not peaceful means. On the Afghan issue it tells us that it is able to solve this problem without any involvement of the world community. In addition, the US fears to find itself on the second positions and therefore it did not agree to participate in the conference in Moscow, where, in its opinion, Russia will lead. But it has no policy, no definite approach to the solution of the Afghanistan’s issue, except for the usage of weapons. For this reason, the US is not ready to participate in the negotiation process. The same, by the way, we see both in Syria and North Korea. We see that now the US has once again started to flex its muscles. We do not see a negotiating policy in any direction,” the political scientist noted.

Military expert Mikhail Khodarenok also noted that the fact of the usage of the GBU-43 high-explosive aerial bomb in Afghanistan is just a “showing of the capabilities” and “flexing of muscle.”

“I personally do not think that the only one dropping of this bomb will somehow affect the overall situation in Afghanistan. Some specific tasks can be solved, of course, but this will not bring a breakthrough in the general development of the situation. This is more a flexing of muscle. This is a demonstration of the capabilities for us [Russia], [North] Korea, Iran and anyone else – look, what we have in the arsenals and this is not everything,” Khodarenok said on the air of the Sputnik broadcasting station.

A military political scientist, an associate professor of the Department of Political Science and Sociology in the Russian Economic University named after G.V. Plekhanov and a retired lieutenant colonel Alexander Perendzhiev also expressed the similar point of view.

“US President Donald Trump tries to show that new, more effective weapons appear during his presidency. And for him it does not matter that this so-called ‘Mother Of All Bombs’ was tested at the beginning of the 2000s. The presentation was made primarily for Iran and North Korea. In this way, the leaders of these states were let to understand that their developed underground infrastructure can be destroyed by American special weapons,” Perendzhiev told the RIA Novosti news agency.

He also stressed that the presentation of the US high-power bomb took place precisely in the period of tensions on the Korean peninsula and in the Middle East.

“The strike of the US Air Force with the ‘Mother Of All Bombs’ against militants of the Islamic State in Afghanistan is another act of a military muscle-flexing that has little practical usefulness for the fight against terrorism,” former chief of the armament of the Russian Armed Forces, Colonel General Anatoly Sitnov, said.

He noted that the effectiveness of the first combat use of the GBU-43 cannot be called high. “This is a purely political step, as well as the strikes on Syria, now there is a tug of war, a demonstration of force. If there were a systemic usage of such bombs, this would be one thing, and, in this way, it turns out that they just showed what they have. There is practically no sense in this, they, as they say, have produced a pile of chippings in Afghanistan, and have done this in the way to produce more noise,” Sitnov said.

He explained that usage of such aerial bombs is effective when an enemy uses casemates and a wide network of underground fortifications, and IS militants, who hide in the mountains of Afghanistan, do not do this.


Popular posts from this blog

Why States Still Use Barrel Bombs

Smoke ascends after a Syrian military helicopter allegedly dropped a barrel bomb over the city of Daraya on Jan. 31.(FADI DIRANI/AFP/Getty Images)

Barrel bombs are not especially effective weapons. They are often poorly constructed; they fail to detonate more often than other devices constructed for a similar purpose; and their lack of precision means they can have a disproportionate effect on civilian populations.

However, combatants continue to use barrel bombs in conflicts, including in recent and ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, and they are ideally suited to the requirements of resource-poor states.


Barrel bombs are improvised devices that contain explosive filling and shrapnel packed into a container, often in a cylindrical shape such as a barrel. The devices continue to be dropped on towns all over Syria. Indeed, there have been several documented cases of their use in Iraq over the past months, and residents of the city of Mosul, which was recently …

Russia Looks East for New Oil Markets

Click to Enlarge

In the final years of the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began orienting his foreign policy toward Asia in response to a rising Japan. Putin has also piloted a much-touted pivot to Asia, coinciding with renewed U.S. interest in the area. A good expression of intent was Russia's hosting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2012 in Vladivostok, near Russia's borders with China and North Korea. Although its efforts in Asia have been limited by more direct interests in Russia's periphery and in Europe, Moscow recently has been able to look more to the east.

Part of this renewed interest involves finding new export markets for Russian hydrocarbons. Russia's economy relies on energy exports, particularly crude oil and natural gas exported via pipeline to the West. However, Western Europe is diversifying its energy sources as new supplies come online out of a desire to reduce its dependence on Russian energy supplies.

This has forced…

In Yemen, a Rebel Advance Could Topple the Regime

Shia loyal to the al-Houthi movement ride past Yemeni soldiers near Yaz, Yemen, in May. (MOHAMMED HUWAIS/AFP/Getty Images)


The success of a rebel campaign in northern Yemen is threatening to destabilize the already weak and overwhelmed government in Sanaa. After capturing the city of Amran, a mere 50 kilometers (30 miles) from the capital, in early July, the rebels from the al-Houthi tribe are in their strongest position yet. The Yemeni government is developing plans to divide the country into six federal regions, and the rebels believe this is their chance to claim territory for the future bargaining.

The central government is nearly powerless to fend off the rebels; its forces are already stretched thin. Neighboring Saudi Arabia has intervened in Yemen before and still supports Sunni tribes in the north, but the risk of inciting a Shiite backlash or creating space for jihadists to move in could deter another intervention.


Followers of Zaidi Islam, a branch of Shiism, rul…