Skip to main content

North Korea Now Says Its Missiles Can Strike ANY City In The USA, Including New York And Washington D.C.

Following its most recent test-fire of an intercontinental ballistic missile on July 28, the communist regime of North Korea has taken to the global stage to announce that it apparently now has the capacity to hit potential targets anywhere in the United States. Kim Jong-Un reportedly issued a challenge to President Donald Trump after the test, warning him that North Korea’s advanced weapons technologies can now strike “at any place and time,” including locales as far away as New York City and Washington, D.C.
Under Kim’s leadership, North Korea is said to have been working tirelessly for many years to develop a nuclear weapon powerful enough to traverse the Atlantic Ocean and hit targets in North America. Since February, North Korea has successfully engaged in 12 missile launches, including both short- and intermediate-range missiles. But the last two launches have apparently involved missiles with intercontinental range – a first for the regime.
As relayed by the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), Kim’s intent with the latest launch was “to send a grave warning to the U.S.” Speaking directly for Kim, this government-run news agency also indicated that its “leader said proudly the test also confirmed all the U.S. mainland is within our striking range,” a direct threat to both the U.S. and its allies.

President Trump denounces launch as ‘reckless and dangerous’

Responding to this provocation, President Trump issued his own condemnation in declaring it to be “reckless and dangerous,” adding that it doesn’t help ensure the security of North Korea as Kim claims. The President also issued his own warning that the U.S. “will take all necessary steps to ensure the security of the American homeland and protect our allies in the region.”
Experts evaluating the situation say that the most recent missile launch by North Korea is much more ominous than the one it performed on July 4. As compared to the liquid-fueled, KN-14 / Hwasong-14 intercontinental ballistic missile launched on the day of America’s independence celebrations, the July 28 launch demonstrated a theoretical range of about 10,000 kilometers, or 6,200 miles. Based on this, it is believed that North Korea could potentially reach targets on the East Coast.
“North Korea seems to have made a logical step forward, as it tries to perfect the technologies to build and field an operationally-viable ICBM that can threaten the mainland United States,” warns Michael Elleman, a missile defense specialist at the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies.
Others like Kim Dong-Yub, a defense analyst at the Institute for Far Eastern Studies at Kyungnam University in South Korea, seem to agree. If North Korea has, indeed, succeeded in miniaturizing its warheads down to a size of about 750 kilograms, or 1,650 pounds, then it might be possible that Kim Jong-Un’s threats are worthy of consideration.
“If the missile carries a 750 kg payload, its range could be 10,000 kilometres,” Dong-Yub is quoted as saying to AFP. “Taking into account the Earth’s rotation, it means it could reach not only the western cities but New York and Washington as well.”
U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson also commented on the latest missile launch, claiming that North Korea isn’t solely responsible for this developing threat. He also condemned Beijing and Moscow for bearing “unique responsibility” in allowing it to happen. Declaring both Russia and China to be “enablers,” Tillerson plans to work with U.S. allies to put “the heaviest possible pressure” on North Korea in response to its repeated violations of United Nations sanctions.
“We confirmed that we will closely cooperate in adopting a fresh UNSC (UN Security Council) resolution, including severe measures, and working on China and Russia,” Japanese Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida told the media following talks with Tillerson about how best to proceed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why States Still Use Barrel Bombs

Smoke ascends after a Syrian military helicopter allegedly dropped a barrel bomb over the city of Daraya on Jan. 31.(FADI DIRANI/AFP/Getty Images) Summary Barrel bombs are not especially effective weapons. They are often poorly constructed; they fail to detonate more often than other devices constructed for a similar purpose; and their lack of precision means they can have a disproportionate effect on civilian populations. However, combatants continue to use barrel bombs in conflicts, including in recent and ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, and they are ideally suited to the requirements of resource-poor states. Analysis Barrel bombs are improvised devices that contain explosive filling and shrapnel packed into a container, often in a cylindrical shape such as a barrel. The devices continue to be dropped on towns all over Syria . Indeed, there have been several documented cases of their use in Iraq over the past months, and residents of the city of Mosul, which was re

Russia Looks East for New Oil Markets

Click to Enlarge In the final years of the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began orienting his foreign policy toward Asia in response to a rising Japan. Putin has also piloted a much-touted pivot to Asia, coinciding with renewed U.S. interest in the area. A good expression of intent was Russia's hosting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2012 in Vladivostok, near Russia's borders with China and North Korea. Although its efforts in Asia have been limited by more direct interests in Russia's periphery and in Europe, Moscow recently has been able to look more to the east. Part of this renewed interest involves finding new export markets for Russian hydrocarbons. Russia's economy relies on energy exports, particularly crude oil and natural gas exported via pipeline to the West. However, Western Europe is diversifying its energy sources as new supplies come online out of a desire to reduce its dependence on Russian energy supplies . This has

LONDON POLICE INDIRECTLY ENCOURAGE CRIMINALS TO ATTACK RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC PROPERTY

ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGE A few days ago an unknown perpetrator trespassed on the territory of the Russian Trade Delegation in London, causing damage to the property and the vehicles belonging to the trade delegation , Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said during the September 12 press briefing. The diplomat revealed the response by the London police was discouraging. Police told that the case does not have any prospects and is likely to be closed. This was made despite the fact that the British law enforcement was provided with video surveillance tapes and detailed information shedding light on the incident. By this byehavior, British law inforcements indirectly encourage criminals to continue attacks on Russian diplomatic property in the UK. Zakharova’s statement on “Trespassing on the Russian Trade Mission premises in London” ( source ): During our briefings, we have repeatedly discussed compliance with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, specif