Skip to main content

New details emerge about Russia’s new, and terrifying, undersea nuclear weapon drone


In recent weeks Russian President Vladimir Putin attended a meeting of top generals in Moscow to discuss his vision for upgrading his military. According to published accounts, he gave a largely boring talk about defeating U.S. missile defense systems to top military brass that also appeared to be bored by the talk.
However, as reported by Foreign Policy, Russian TV cameras happened to catch a glimpse (see above) of a new nuclear weapon platform that, should Moscow decide to build, could be a game-changer.
The system? Status-6: An underwater sub-like drone that is designed to transport a thermonuclear weapon into foreign ports. If detonated, the weapon is capable of extinguishing major port cities like New York with blast and massive amounts of radioactive fallout.
“At the risk of understating things, this project is bat-shit crazy,” writes Jeffrey Lewis for Foreign Policy. “It harkens back to the most absurd moments of the Cold War, when nuclear strategists followed the logic of deterrence over the cliff and into the abyss. For his part, Putin seems positively nostalgic.”
But there is nothing phony about the project. In fact, the Russian government acted as if a major security breach had occurred following televised transmission of the briefing book images.
The offending images were summarily edited out of resultant broadcasts and, when asked about it, a Russian presidential spokesperson said, “Indeed, some secrets hit the camera lens, so were subsequently removed. We hope that in the future this will not happen again.”
This is not the first Western intelligence officials have heard of the Status-6. Earlier this fall, as we reported, details of a similar Russian nuclear underwater drone, Kanyon, were revealed by The Washington Free Beacon. Status-6 appears to be the same project, though the names are different (the WFB notes that “Kanyon” is the name given the project by the Pentagon, indicating it is a structured weapons program).
Still, the briefing book slide provides many additional details about the project. A Russian attack sub would be able to carry at least one, and possibly more, of the drones, which could then be launched remotely while at sea. Once set free, the drones may be able to travel about 10,000 nautical kilometers (5,400 nautical miles). It would be designed in such a way it could be remotely navigated into a U.S. port and detonate its “combat payload.” It appears designed to remain stealthy and underwater its entire voyage, thus avoiding U.S. missiles and other countermeasures.
And while those details are obviously concerning, there is this: The nuclear warhead’s purpose is to damage “the important components of the adversary’s economy in a coastal area and [inflict] unacceptable damage to a country’s territory by creating wide radioactive contamination that would be unsuitable for military, economic or other activity for long periods of time.”
So the warhead wouldn’t just be nuclear; the weapon will be designed as a “dirty nuke,” and one far larger than any terrorist group could ever hope to construct.
“This isn’t the sort of dirty bomb that terrorists might build to spread a small amount of radioactive material about and cause panic. We’re talking about a massive, megaton-sized thermonuclear weapon designed to produce significant, long-lasting radiation effects,” writes Lewis.
It may be too soon to judge the veracity of Status-6, but it’s a safe bet the Pentagon is already looking into the matter and examining ways to detect and defeat such systems.
Earlier, the Washington Free Beacon reported that that details surrounding the secret Russian drone sub are closely held within the U.S. government and intelligence community.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why States Still Use Barrel Bombs

Smoke ascends after a Syrian military helicopter allegedly dropped a barrel bomb over the city of Daraya on Jan. 31.(FADI DIRANI/AFP/Getty Images) Summary Barrel bombs are not especially effective weapons. They are often poorly constructed; they fail to detonate more often than other devices constructed for a similar purpose; and their lack of precision means they can have a disproportionate effect on civilian populations. However, combatants continue to use barrel bombs in conflicts, including in recent and ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, and they are ideally suited to the requirements of resource-poor states. Analysis Barrel bombs are improvised devices that contain explosive filling and shrapnel packed into a container, often in a cylindrical shape such as a barrel. The devices continue to be dropped on towns all over Syria . Indeed, there have been several documented cases of their use in Iraq over the past months, and residents of the city of Mosul, which was re

Russia Looks East for New Oil Markets

Click to Enlarge In the final years of the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began orienting his foreign policy toward Asia in response to a rising Japan. Putin has also piloted a much-touted pivot to Asia, coinciding with renewed U.S. interest in the area. A good expression of intent was Russia's hosting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2012 in Vladivostok, near Russia's borders with China and North Korea. Although its efforts in Asia have been limited by more direct interests in Russia's periphery and in Europe, Moscow recently has been able to look more to the east. Part of this renewed interest involves finding new export markets for Russian hydrocarbons. Russia's economy relies on energy exports, particularly crude oil and natural gas exported via pipeline to the West. However, Western Europe is diversifying its energy sources as new supplies come online out of a desire to reduce its dependence on Russian energy supplies . This has

LONDON POLICE INDIRECTLY ENCOURAGE CRIMINALS TO ATTACK RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC PROPERTY

ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGE A few days ago an unknown perpetrator trespassed on the territory of the Russian Trade Delegation in London, causing damage to the property and the vehicles belonging to the trade delegation , Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said during the September 12 press briefing. The diplomat revealed the response by the London police was discouraging. Police told that the case does not have any prospects and is likely to be closed. This was made despite the fact that the British law enforcement was provided with video surveillance tapes and detailed information shedding light on the incident. By this byehavior, British law inforcements indirectly encourage criminals to continue attacks on Russian diplomatic property in the UK. Zakharova’s statement on “Trespassing on the Russian Trade Mission premises in London” ( source ): During our briefings, we have repeatedly discussed compliance with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, specif