Skip to main content

Nuke alert: CIA Director says North Korea will be able to nuke any U.S. city before the end of 2018




North Korea may be run by a deranged, tyrannical psychopath, but that doesn’t mean that they aren’t a direct threat to the United States and the people that live here.
During an interview with “CBS This Morning” earlier this week, CIA Director Mike Pompeo placed a significant amount of emphasis on a new report that suggests that the North Korean regime will be able to strike the United States with a nuclear warhead in just a “handful of months.” Previously, the intelligence community thought that North Korea wouldn’t be able to launch a successful nuclear strike on the United States for at least a year, but now it appears that there is less time than the U.S. government originally thought. (Related: Watch this video lecture from the Health Ranger on how North Korea can exterminate 90% of the U.S. population.)
“Here’s what we can say,” the CIA director said in the interview. “We can always identify that the program is continuing. …We’ll never know the exact nature of what’s taking place. We’ll never know the exact moment that they’re going to continue. But the core risk is that the policymakers needed to know was that North Korea’s nuclear weapons program is continuing to expand, advance, become more powerful, more capable, more reliable.”

When asked how close Kim Jon Un is to being able to strike the United States with a nuclear weapon, Pompeo answered, “A handful of months.” When the interviewer pointed out that Pompeo had given that same answer more than six months ago, Pompeo explained that he hopes he will be able to continue saying it a year from now, and that the U.S. government is working hard to extend that timeline.
Each and every time new information comes out regarding North Korea’s ability to hit the United States with a nuclear missile, it sparks a public debate on how the U.S. government should respond. Traditionally, those on the left side of the political spectrum believe in strategies of appeasement and negotiations, even though compromising with a tyrannical maniac is about as reliable as telling a dog not to eat a steak you left on the counter unattended. (Related: North Korea can now kill off 90% of the U.S. population with a single warhead that doesn’t even need to survive atmospheric re-entry.)
On the flipside, conservatives have typically supported the idea of taking a much more aggressive approach to dealing with the North Korean regime, which mostly consists of threats, hardened rhetoric, and a strategy that the late Ronald Reagan used to call “peace through strength.” President Donald Trump himself is also on board with this strategy, which is a good sign for all Americans that value national security.
Earlier this month, Trump took to Twitter to taunt Kim Jong Un and make him aware that he has a “button” for nuclear weapons. “North Korean Leader Kim Jong-Un just stated that the ‘Nuclear Button is on his desk at all times.’ Will someone from his depleted and food starved regime please inform him that I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works!”
As great as it is that President Trump is demonstrating that America won’t be frightened or intimidated into compliance, the fact of the matter remains that the North Korean regime is still arming up and making serious threats against the United States. As such, there very well may come a day when hardened rhetoric is no longer enough, and our country will have to engage in physical combat with Kim Jong Un and his ilk. Hopefully, it will not come to that, but in as long as it is even a possibility, America must remain ready.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why States Still Use Barrel Bombs

Smoke ascends after a Syrian military helicopter allegedly dropped a barrel bomb over the city of Daraya on Jan. 31.(FADI DIRANI/AFP/Getty Images) Summary Barrel bombs are not especially effective weapons. They are often poorly constructed; they fail to detonate more often than other devices constructed for a similar purpose; and their lack of precision means they can have a disproportionate effect on civilian populations. However, combatants continue to use barrel bombs in conflicts, including in recent and ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, and they are ideally suited to the requirements of resource-poor states. Analysis Barrel bombs are improvised devices that contain explosive filling and shrapnel packed into a container, often in a cylindrical shape such as a barrel. The devices continue to be dropped on towns all over Syria . Indeed, there have been several documented cases of their use in Iraq over the past months, and residents of the city of Mosul, which was re...

Russia Looks East for New Oil Markets

Click to Enlarge In the final years of the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began orienting his foreign policy toward Asia in response to a rising Japan. Putin has also piloted a much-touted pivot to Asia, coinciding with renewed U.S. interest in the area. A good expression of intent was Russia's hosting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2012 in Vladivostok, near Russia's borders with China and North Korea. Although its efforts in Asia have been limited by more direct interests in Russia's periphery and in Europe, Moscow recently has been able to look more to the east. Part of this renewed interest involves finding new export markets for Russian hydrocarbons. Russia's economy relies on energy exports, particularly crude oil and natural gas exported via pipeline to the West. However, Western Europe is diversifying its energy sources as new supplies come online out of a desire to reduce its dependence on Russian energy supplies . This has ...

LONDON POLICE INDIRECTLY ENCOURAGE CRIMINALS TO ATTACK RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC PROPERTY

ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGE A few days ago an unknown perpetrator trespassed on the territory of the Russian Trade Delegation in London, causing damage to the property and the vehicles belonging to the trade delegation , Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said during the September 12 press briefing. The diplomat revealed the response by the London police was discouraging. Police told that the case does not have any prospects and is likely to be closed. This was made despite the fact that the British law enforcement was provided with video surveillance tapes and detailed information shedding light on the incident. By this byehavior, British law inforcements indirectly encourage criminals to continue attacks on Russian diplomatic property in the UK. Zakharova’s statement on “Trespassing on the Russian Trade Mission premises in London” ( source ): During our briefings, we have repeatedly discussed compliance with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, sp...