Skip to main content

Chasing technology: Pentagon rushes to deal with security risk of enemy drones




The advancement of technology is truly bittersweet. One the one hand, technology has made our lives incredibly convenient and simple, but on the other hand, it has led to the emergence of more privacy concerns and security threats that didn’t exist just decades ago.
Currently, law enforcement is having a difficult time keeping up with the rapid advancement of technology, and more specifically, the development of drones, which today have the ability to do everything from capturing video footage to carrying customized weapons. As former Secret Service agent and author Dan Bongino put it, the Secret Service is mainly equipped and trained to stop attacks that happen on the ground, meaning that airborne threats, such as threats posed by a weaponized drone for instance, create “additional security complications.” Many Pentagon officials have issued similar warnings, arguing that the current drone-fighting technologies are “still immature” and require “further development.”
In response to this growing security threat, the Pentagon has launched a $700 million program to combat weaponized drones deployed by the Islamic State. Indeed, ISIS has increased the number of drones they use on the battlefield in recent months, so a proper response from the Pentagon is essential to ensure the safety of our military personnel and the American people. (Related: Spy drones can be hijacked by terrorists and used as weapons.)
Last month, tests were carried out at the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico by firms such as Boeing and Lockheed Martin, the latter of which tested an incredible new laser weapon system called “Athena” that is capable of taking down an enemy drone with a single blow. Additionally, Athena can be mounted on top of tanks and other ground-based military vehicles, and may one day be installed on military planes, helicopters and ships as well.
“The tests at White Sands against aerial targets validated our lethality models and replicated the results we’ve seen against static targets at our own test range,” explained Lockheed Martin’s Chief Technology Officer Keoki Jackson. “As we mature the technology behind laser weapon systems, we’re making the entire system more effective and moving closer to a laser weapon that will provide greater protection to our warfighters by taking on more sophisticated threats from a lower range.”
But while drones do pose a significant threat to national security both domestically and overseas, that doesn’t mean that the United States can’t fight fire with fire and use weaponized drones against our own enemies. In fact, many lawmakers in the state of Connecticut see the use of lethal force from above as the future of law enforcement.
Earlier this year, House Bill 7260 made its way through the halls of Connecticut’s congress building, which would have allowed police officers to use weaponized drones in order to hunt down dangerous criminals and enforce the law out on the streets. “We have to be able to fight fire with fire,” explained state Senator John Kissel at the time, a Republican co-chair of the Judiciary Committee. “The use of weaponized drones isn’t going to go away because we don’t like it, so we have to do something now.” Unfortunately, House Bill 7260 did not get passed Congress and become law in the state of Connecticut, but still, it is a good indicator that weaponized drones in law enforcement may very well one day become reality.
Perhaps there is another major benefit to technology other than the obvious fact that it makes our day-to-day lives more convenient: It forces our country to continue thinking of new ideas and new ways of doing things, thus propelling our society as a whole forward into the future.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why States Still Use Barrel Bombs

Smoke ascends after a Syrian military helicopter allegedly dropped a barrel bomb over the city of Daraya on Jan. 31.(FADI DIRANI/AFP/Getty Images) Summary Barrel bombs are not especially effective weapons. They are often poorly constructed; they fail to detonate more often than other devices constructed for a similar purpose; and their lack of precision means they can have a disproportionate effect on civilian populations. However, combatants continue to use barrel bombs in conflicts, including in recent and ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, and they are ideally suited to the requirements of resource-poor states. Analysis Barrel bombs are improvised devices that contain explosive filling and shrapnel packed into a container, often in a cylindrical shape such as a barrel. The devices continue to be dropped on towns all over Syria . Indeed, there have been several documented cases of their use in Iraq over the past months, and residents of the city of Mosul, which was re

Russia Looks East for New Oil Markets

Click to Enlarge In the final years of the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began orienting his foreign policy toward Asia in response to a rising Japan. Putin has also piloted a much-touted pivot to Asia, coinciding with renewed U.S. interest in the area. A good expression of intent was Russia's hosting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2012 in Vladivostok, near Russia's borders with China and North Korea. Although its efforts in Asia have been limited by more direct interests in Russia's periphery and in Europe, Moscow recently has been able to look more to the east. Part of this renewed interest involves finding new export markets for Russian hydrocarbons. Russia's economy relies on energy exports, particularly crude oil and natural gas exported via pipeline to the West. However, Western Europe is diversifying its energy sources as new supplies come online out of a desire to reduce its dependence on Russian energy supplies . This has

LONDON POLICE INDIRECTLY ENCOURAGE CRIMINALS TO ATTACK RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC PROPERTY

ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGE A few days ago an unknown perpetrator trespassed on the territory of the Russian Trade Delegation in London, causing damage to the property and the vehicles belonging to the trade delegation , Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said during the September 12 press briefing. The diplomat revealed the response by the London police was discouraging. Police told that the case does not have any prospects and is likely to be closed. This was made despite the fact that the British law enforcement was provided with video surveillance tapes and detailed information shedding light on the incident. By this byehavior, British law inforcements indirectly encourage criminals to continue attacks on Russian diplomatic property in the UK. Zakharova’s statement on “Trespassing on the Russian Trade Mission premises in London” ( source ): During our briefings, we have repeatedly discussed compliance with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, specif