Skip to main content

FOUR SECONDS UNTIL WORLD WAR 3


Four Seconds Until World War 3
The doomsday clock is ticking.
The recent series of events, which includes the so-called Skripal case and the alleged chemical attack in Syria, has put the world on the brink of a big aggressive war in the Middle East.
Forces instigating this war pursue two main goals:
  • To justify the growing military spending and to assure the economic domination of the so-called US-led bloc over the rest of the world. The military industrial complex and multinational corporations controlled by the Euro-Atlantic establishment will be the main beneficiary party of this new big war.
  • To save the US-led unipolar world order and the so-called Western value system. This will allow the Euro-Atlantic elites to continue using the existing system to remain in power and to drain resources from national states.
After US ambassador to UN Nikki Haley threatened that the US will strike Syrian forces if they continue combating militants in the Eastern Ghouta region near Damascus, SF wrote in its article entitled “Five Seconds Until World War 3”:
“It’s possible that an escalation scenario in both Syria and Ukraine may be implemented by the US establishment soon after or during the presidential election in Russia. The goal of these actions will be to stage an aggressive war against Russia.”
However, Vladimir Putin achieved a decisive victory in the Russian presidential election on March 18. The so-called “pro-Western opposition” was not able to nominate a competitive presidential candidate and faced a total failure. The escalation in Syria was also prevented and a successful operation to liberate Eastern Ghouta was launched by Syrian forces, backed by Russia and Iran.
Then, another attempt to escalation situation was conducted using the so-called Skripal case. On March 4, former Russian military intelligence officer and British spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia were allegedly poisoned in the UK with what London described as the Russian-made Novichok nerve agent. The UK, the US and some other states expelled over 100 Russian diplomats and used the incident to increase pressure on Russia.
However, by early April, it had appeared that the British claims of “Russian” origin of the nerve agent had been a lie.The entire Skripal poisoning story is collapsing as a Russian involvement can hardly be proven by some reliable evidence besides “the Russians did it” PowerPoint presentations.
Then, the attention of the so-called international community was once again drawn to Syria. By April 7, Syrian forces have liberated the almost entire area of Eastern Ghouta, leaving the only militant-held town of Douma where sporadic clashes and complicated negotiations have been ongoing. On April 8, local militants – members of Jaish al-Islam – surrendered their positions and accepted a withdrawal agreement allowing them to move to other militant-held areas of Syria. However, between April 7 and April 8, “the Assad regime” conducted a chemical weapons attack on the town killing lots of people, at least this what pro-militant media activists and the mainstream media want you to believe.
US President Donald Trump, that had vowed to withdraw troops from the war-torn country few days ago, accused Syria, Russia and Iran of the civilian casualties and promised a “forceful” response to the alleged attack. Now, the US and its allies, mostly the UK and France, are considering their options and drawing military plans for the attack on Syria. The president of the most powerful country in the world is ready to start what may become a nuclear warbecause he has been triggered by rumors and awful pictures in social media. What a twist!
Russia’s Defense Ministry, Foreign Ministry and even President Putin had repeatedly warned of appearing info indicating preparations for chemical weapons provocations across Syria, including the area of Easter Ghouta. However, the US-led coalition ignored the warnings.
It is important to note that the liberation of Eastern Ghouta is a kind of a “red line” after which their game in Syria will worsen. According to pro-government sources, roughly a 18,000-strong striking force has been involved in the operation since its start in February 2018. The total number of pro-government fighters that are directly or indirectly involved in the effort to secure the area is up to 30,000.
Should Eastern Ghouta be secured this force will be free for future operations against militants across Syria. The Yarmouk camp area controlled by ISIS, as well las the militant-held parts of eastern and southern Syria are among of the obvious targets for the upcoming Syrian anti-terrorist operations. This will further shift the balance of power in Syria and put the US-led coalition occupying parts of the country in a complicated situation.
This chain of events clearly shows how some powers are instigating a new big war in order to pursue own financial and political interests. Is the US president ready to become a foot soldier in their game? The next few days will show.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why States Still Use Barrel Bombs

Smoke ascends after a Syrian military helicopter allegedly dropped a barrel bomb over the city of Daraya on Jan. 31.(FADI DIRANI/AFP/Getty Images) Summary Barrel bombs are not especially effective weapons. They are often poorly constructed; they fail to detonate more often than other devices constructed for a similar purpose; and their lack of precision means they can have a disproportionate effect on civilian populations. However, combatants continue to use barrel bombs in conflicts, including in recent and ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, and they are ideally suited to the requirements of resource-poor states. Analysis Barrel bombs are improvised devices that contain explosive filling and shrapnel packed into a container, often in a cylindrical shape such as a barrel. The devices continue to be dropped on towns all over Syria . Indeed, there have been several documented cases of their use in Iraq over the past months, and residents of the city of Mosul, which was re

Russia Looks East for New Oil Markets

Click to Enlarge In the final years of the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began orienting his foreign policy toward Asia in response to a rising Japan. Putin has also piloted a much-touted pivot to Asia, coinciding with renewed U.S. interest in the area. A good expression of intent was Russia's hosting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2012 in Vladivostok, near Russia's borders with China and North Korea. Although its efforts in Asia have been limited by more direct interests in Russia's periphery and in Europe, Moscow recently has been able to look more to the east. Part of this renewed interest involves finding new export markets for Russian hydrocarbons. Russia's economy relies on energy exports, particularly crude oil and natural gas exported via pipeline to the West. However, Western Europe is diversifying its energy sources as new supplies come online out of a desire to reduce its dependence on Russian energy supplies . This has

LONDON POLICE INDIRECTLY ENCOURAGE CRIMINALS TO ATTACK RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC PROPERTY

ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGE A few days ago an unknown perpetrator trespassed on the territory of the Russian Trade Delegation in London, causing damage to the property and the vehicles belonging to the trade delegation , Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said during the September 12 press briefing. The diplomat revealed the response by the London police was discouraging. Police told that the case does not have any prospects and is likely to be closed. This was made despite the fact that the British law enforcement was provided with video surveillance tapes and detailed information shedding light on the incident. By this byehavior, British law inforcements indirectly encourage criminals to continue attacks on Russian diplomatic property in the UK. Zakharova’s statement on “Trespassing on the Russian Trade Mission premises in London” ( source ): During our briefings, we have repeatedly discussed compliance with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, specif