Skip to main content

INDIA TO FINALIZE S-400 DEAL WITH RUSSIA DESPITE US PRESSURE: INDIAN DEFENSE MINISTER


India To Finalize S-400 Deal With Russia Despite US Pressure: Indian Defense Minister
Sputnik / Mihail Mokrushin
India will finalize the deal for almost $5.7 bn acquisition of five advanced S-400 Triumf air defence missiles from Russia. This was confirmed to the India Times by Defense Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in New Delhi on July 13th.
The S-400 missile systems, which can detect, track and destroy hostile strategic bombers, stealth fighters, spy planes, missiles and drones at a range of up to 400 km and an altitude of 30 km.
India has just reached the final phase and there has been an outcry because such a purchase is prohibited under the recent US law called CAATSA (Countering America’s Adversaries through Sanctions Act) which deters countries from purchasing Russian weapons. However, it is arguable if it should be applied to this situation, since the, Indian Times reports has been in the works since 2015, long before the US law was entered into force.
The Diplomat reports that Indian Defense Minister has stated “With Russia, we have had a continuous relationship of defense procurement of seven decades. We told the U.S. Congress delegation which met me in Delhi that this it is U.S. legislation and not a UN law. We have had this relationship, an enduring relationship with the Russians and are going ahead with buying the S-400.” Earlier this year, in May, Indian Times and the Diplomat reported that India and Russia have finalized the price and are now in the last stages and the deal shall not be hindered by US legislation.
There will be a dialogue between the Indian Defense Minister Nirmala Sitharaman and Foreign Minister Sushma Swaraj and their American counterparts – Jim Mattis and Mike Pompeo. This will happen in early September. Since the deal has begun prior to CAATSA, both Mattis and Pompeo have argued in defense of countries such as India who has new military projects with Russia worth $12 bn, as well as an operational need to maintain the huge inventory of Russian-origin weapon systems in its armed forces.
The Diplomat reports that in 2016, the Obama administrations declared India as a “major defense partner”, thus giving it access to sensitive US military technology, however India is not an ally, it is a strategic partner in the region.
The meeting between Defense and Foreign Ministers will also include discussions regarding bilateral military pacts such as COMCASA (Communications, Compatibility and Security Agreement) and BECA (Basic Exchange and Cooperation Agreement for Geo-Spatial Cooperation) which the US has tried to put forward for 15 years, reports the Indian Times.
Turkey, in a similar situation is about to finalize buying S-400 missiles and the US tried to pressure them in the same way. General Tod Wolters, the NATO Allied Air Commander, commented in front of Reuters that the news of this purchase was worrying, however he was trying to hold strong ties with Turkey. The US is attempting to block any sale of F-35 fighter jets to Turkey, because of worries that the S-400 system could receive vital information in the F-35 technology.
David Deptula, a retired Air Force general and industry consultant, commented in front of Reuters – “The Turks have to make a choice. They’re either going to be part of NATO or they’re going to move into the Russian camp in terms of defense.”
However, General Wolters is positive that the security threat that the integration of a S-400 in a NATO defense posed is yet to be determined, however it has not hindered communication with the Turkish military as a NATO ally. However Turkey is adamant that if there are sanctions against its decision to complete the deal with Russia, there will be a retaliation against the US.
India and Turkey show that it will not be hindered by US pressure, despite being its strategic partner, and in the case of Turkey ally, they also works towards their own interest in making deals with Russia, showing that they pursue their own interests above all.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why States Still Use Barrel Bombs

Smoke ascends after a Syrian military helicopter allegedly dropped a barrel bomb over the city of Daraya on Jan. 31.(FADI DIRANI/AFP/Getty Images) Summary Barrel bombs are not especially effective weapons. They are often poorly constructed; they fail to detonate more often than other devices constructed for a similar purpose; and their lack of precision means they can have a disproportionate effect on civilian populations. However, combatants continue to use barrel bombs in conflicts, including in recent and ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, and they are ideally suited to the requirements of resource-poor states. Analysis Barrel bombs are improvised devices that contain explosive filling and shrapnel packed into a container, often in a cylindrical shape such as a barrel. The devices continue to be dropped on towns all over Syria . Indeed, there have been several documented cases of their use in Iraq over the past months, and residents of the city of Mosul, which was re

Russia Looks East for New Oil Markets

Click to Enlarge In the final years of the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began orienting his foreign policy toward Asia in response to a rising Japan. Putin has also piloted a much-touted pivot to Asia, coinciding with renewed U.S. interest in the area. A good expression of intent was Russia's hosting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2012 in Vladivostok, near Russia's borders with China and North Korea. Although its efforts in Asia have been limited by more direct interests in Russia's periphery and in Europe, Moscow recently has been able to look more to the east. Part of this renewed interest involves finding new export markets for Russian hydrocarbons. Russia's economy relies on energy exports, particularly crude oil and natural gas exported via pipeline to the West. However, Western Europe is diversifying its energy sources as new supplies come online out of a desire to reduce its dependence on Russian energy supplies . This has

LONDON POLICE INDIRECTLY ENCOURAGE CRIMINALS TO ATTACK RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC PROPERTY

ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGE A few days ago an unknown perpetrator trespassed on the territory of the Russian Trade Delegation in London, causing damage to the property and the vehicles belonging to the trade delegation , Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said during the September 12 press briefing. The diplomat revealed the response by the London police was discouraging. Police told that the case does not have any prospects and is likely to be closed. This was made despite the fact that the British law enforcement was provided with video surveillance tapes and detailed information shedding light on the incident. By this byehavior, British law inforcements indirectly encourage criminals to continue attacks on Russian diplomatic property in the UK. Zakharova’s statement on “Trespassing on the Russian Trade Mission premises in London” ( source ): During our briefings, we have repeatedly discussed compliance with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, specif