ISDEI Instituto de Seguridad, Defensa y Estudios Internacionales

Expanding on the conspiracy view regarding the Ukraine conflict, here are several facets that conspiracy theorists often highlight:

Hidden Agendas and Profiteering

Military-Industrial Complex: One prevalent theory posits that the prolonged conflict in Ukraine serves the interests of the military-industrial complex. According to this view, major defense contractors and arms manufacturers in the U.S. and Russia benefit financially from continuous warfare. These corporations allegedly exert influence over their respective governments to ensure that the conflict persists, thereby securing ongoing contracts for weapons and military technology (Geopolitical Monitor) (EY US).

Geopolitical Manipulation: Some theorists suggest that the Ukraine war is a deliberate effort by global elites to destabilize Europe. By creating a persistent state of conflict, these elites purportedly aim to weaken the European Union's political cohesion and economic stability, making it easier to control or influence European policy and markets. This destabilization is seen as a means to prevent Europe from becoming a counterbalance to U.S. and Russian power (POLITICO) (Geopolitical Monitor).

Proxy War Allegations

Testing Ground: Another theory posits that Ukraine is being used as a proxy battleground where the U.S. and Russia can test new military strategies and technologies without engaging in direct conflict. This view suggests that both countries are more interested in the data and experience gained from the conflict than in Ukraine's sovereignty or welfare. According to this theory, advanced weapons systems, cyber warfare tactics, and intelligence operations are being refined at the expense of Ukrainian lives and stability (Geopolitical Monitor).

Energy and Resource Control: Conspiracy theorists also argue that the conflict is a cover for control over Ukraine’s substantial natural resources, including its significant gas reserves and agricultural output. By maintaining instability, powerful entities can gain favorable terms for resource extraction and agricultural production, ensuring that these assets remain under their influence rather than under a stable, sovereign Ukraine (POLITICO).

Distraction and Division

Western Distraction: There is a theory that the war in Ukraine is partly intended to distract Western populations and governments from other critical issues. These might include domestic economic problems, political scandals, or other international conflicts. By focusing media and public attention on Ukraine, governments can allegedly divert scrutiny and criticism from more contentious or damaging issues at home (EY US).

Divide and Conquer: Some believe that the conflict is engineered to divide international alliances. By drawing NATO members into a prolonged and costly support effort for Ukraine, theorists argue that the conflict strains these alliances, potentially leading to rifts and weakened collective defense postures. This division could benefit adversaries like Russia, which might find it easier to assert its influence without a united Western front (Geopolitical Monitor).

Misinformation and Psychological Operations

Propaganda Campaigns: Conspiracy theories often highlight the role of misinformation and psychological operations. They suggest that both Russian and Western intelligence agencies are engaged in extensive propaganda campaigns to shape public perception and policy. This might include exaggerating threats, fabricating incidents, or spreading disinformation to justify continued military engagement and expenditures (POLITICO) (Geopolitical Monitor).

Media Manipulation: Relatedly, there are claims that mainstream media outlets are complicit in this conspiracy, either knowingly or as unwitting tools. By selectively reporting on aspects of the conflict that align with certain narratives, these outlets allegedly help sustain public support for the war and the policies of the elites controlling the narrative (EY US).

These conspiracy theories, while lacking substantial evidence and often dismissed by credible sources, continue to resonate with segments of the population distrustful of official narratives and skeptical of geopolitical motivations. They reflect deep-seated concerns about hidden power structures and the true cost of international conflicts.

Why States Still Use Barrel Bombs

Smoke ascends after a Syrian military helicopter allegedly dropped a barrel bomb over the city of Daraya on Jan. 31.(FADI DIRANI/AFP/Getty Images) Summary Barrel bombs are not especially effective weapons. They are often poorly constructed; they fail to detonate more often than other devices constructed for a similar purpose; and their lack of precision means they can have a disproportionate effect on civilian populations. However, combatants continue to use barrel bombs in conflicts, including in recent and ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, and they are ideally suited to the requirements of resource-poor states. Analysis Barrel bombs are improvised devices that contain explosive filling and shrapnel packed into a container, often in a cylindrical shape such as a barrel. The devices continue to be dropped on towns all over Syria . Indeed, there have been several documented cases of their use in Iraq over the past months, and residents of the city of Mosul, which was re

Russia Looks East for New Oil Markets

Click to Enlarge In the final years of the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began orienting his foreign policy toward Asia in response to a rising Japan. Putin has also piloted a much-touted pivot to Asia, coinciding with renewed U.S. interest in the area. A good expression of intent was Russia's hosting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2012 in Vladivostok, near Russia's borders with China and North Korea. Although its efforts in Asia have been limited by more direct interests in Russia's periphery and in Europe, Moscow recently has been able to look more to the east. Part of this renewed interest involves finding new export markets for Russian hydrocarbons. Russia's economy relies on energy exports, particularly crude oil and natural gas exported via pipeline to the West. However, Western Europe is diversifying its energy sources as new supplies come online out of a desire to reduce its dependence on Russian energy supplies . This has

LONDON POLICE INDIRECTLY ENCOURAGE CRIMINALS TO ATTACK RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC PROPERTY

ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGE A few days ago an unknown perpetrator trespassed on the territory of the Russian Trade Delegation in London, causing damage to the property and the vehicles belonging to the trade delegation , Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said during the September 12 press briefing. The diplomat revealed the response by the London police was discouraging. Police told that the case does not have any prospects and is likely to be closed. This was made despite the fact that the British law enforcement was provided with video surveillance tapes and detailed information shedding light on the incident. By this byehavior, British law inforcements indirectly encourage criminals to continue attacks on Russian diplomatic property in the UK. Zakharova’s statement on “Trespassing on the Russian Trade Mission premises in London” ( source ): During our briefings, we have repeatedly discussed compliance with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, specif

ISDEI Instituto de Seguridad, Defensa y Estudios Internacionales

Search This Blog