Skip to main content

Taliban Talks: What is Afghanistan’s Hamid Karzai Really Up To?

By Pepe Escobar

- Whatever one’s judgment of sartorially immaculate crypto-American puppet Afghan President Hamid Karzai, he’s not a fool.

So now the word is out, via his spokesman Aimal Fazi, that Karzai envoys have been negotiating in Dubai with the Afghan Taliban. And Karzai, on top of it, is boldly encouraging Washington to join the party. Otherwise, he won’t sign a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) – the key plot line in the Hindu Kush’s favorite geopolitical soap opera for over a year now.

Let’s try to break this mess down succinctly.

On one side we have the Obama administration dying to exit Afghanistan, but with the Pentagon adamant on keeping boots on the ground and at least some well-located pearls in its vast Empire of Bases.

On the other we have a US puppet who needs to think about his future after whatever form the American exit takes; otherwise the Taliban may grill him like a live kebab.

And in the middle, just merrily watching the proceedings, we have the Afghan Taliban, which will inevitably make a killing – literally and otherwise - whichever way the Hindu Kush winds blow.
Mullah Omar in da house

This running comedy includes plot twists worthy of the TV show Homeland. The Obama administration even tried to negotiate with the Taliban in Qatar; by June last year, failure was evident. At the time, Karzai angrily denounced it.

Now it’s his turn – complete with his added American enticement. Plus the hugely popular demand that the Obama administration abandon its modus operandi of repeatedly targeting Afghan villages in the drone war – with loads of “collateral damage.”

One may imagine the roars of laughter of Taliban supremo Mullah Omar at his secret refuge, possibly in Quetta – so secret that the NSA has never intercepted anything in or out of it.

Omar and his mullahs may – or may not – hold the pleasure of playing Karzai like a violin, lots of sophisticated Pashtun subterfuge included. Still, any way they play, they can’t lose. They know that as much as Karzai badly needs to buy some protection, Mob-style, he may also insert them – in a totally legit way – inside the Afghan political scene. What’s not to like?

The Obama administration, as usual, is puzzled. The official spin – playing like a scratched CD – is about “fighting Al-Qaeda.” It’s not. Al-Qaeda has been non-existent in Afghanistan for years. The fight is against the Taliban. Now, not only we’re sort of kicking ourselves out, but we also need to talk to them?

The point is everybody needs a deal with everybody else. Karzai well knows he needs to cut a deal with the Taliban; otherwise his successor, to be chosen in next April’s elections, will be crushed by them.

Karzai also knows that crucial strategic/intelligence sectors in Pakistan support the Afghan Taliban, even as the Obama administration has advertised a current strategic dialog with Pakistan. Any progress with that with drones in and out of Afghanistan continuing to strike the tribal areas in Pakistan is an absolute no-no.

The Obama administration now even faces the possibility of a double defeat; no SOFA in Afghanistan – because Karzai or his successor won’t sign it – implying no US troops whatsoever staying beyond the end of 2014; and on top of it being forced to talk to the Taliban.

The privileged spectators of this whole mess are regional powers Russia, China, Iran and India. They are also well aware that things will never get better in Islamabad with the Americans still ensconced in their bases in Afghanistan.

What they certainly don’t want – except Delhi – is any remaining US/NATO deployment in Afghanistan. Especially because they know the next step would be the Obama administration – not to mention a possible, future, hawkish Hillary Clinton administration – deploying the US missile defense system in the Hindu Kush, a cataclysmic move in the New Great Game in Eurasia if there ever was one.

So all’s still at play in Afghanistan – depending on the results of the April elections. The Taliban, as a fighting force, remains powerful, but as an electoral force it won’t be going anywhere. Karzai’s game implies a big play for some sort of ceremonial role after the supposed American drawdown – as in politically legitimizing the Taliban. Still the Taliban holds the privilege of choosing either to be led down this road, or do it in its own hardcore way.
Remember that pipeline?

Now compare the process in Afghanistan with the one across the border, where the Pakistani Taliban (TTP) are considering talking with the government of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif (the offer was Sharif’s).

The key condition is for the government to “implement the constitution, which has been violated,” according to famous maulana Samiul Haq, whose madrassa near Peshawar – dubbed ‘the Taliban Harvard’ – has been educating them since the early 1990s.

Haq insists Sharif should renounce “the foreign war” – as in no more collaboration with the Americans. And Sharia law should be enforced immediately.

So negotiating with the Pakistani Taliban may result in Islamabad coping with significantly less, or even no, bombings. At the same time that implies the Pakistani Taliban further being able to project soft power right inside the Pakistani mainstream. For the Sharif government, it’s a risk worth taking.

As Sharif is about to talk to the TTP while Karzai is already talking to the Afghan chapter, Washington risks being left talking to itself. And ruminating on those long gone days of the second Clinton administration, when all that it took to mollify the Taliban was to give them a cut of that perennial pipe dream, the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan (TAP) gas pipeline.

No deal was cut, and the rest was, is and will remain the ultimate, lethal Hindu Kush tragicomedy.

Pepe Escobar is the roving correspondent for Asia Times/Hong Kong, an analyst for RT and TomDispatch, and a frequent contributor to websites and radio shows ranging from the US to East Asia.

This article was originally published at RT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why States Still Use Barrel Bombs

Smoke ascends after a Syrian military helicopter allegedly dropped a barrel bomb over the city of Daraya on Jan. 31.(FADI DIRANI/AFP/Getty Images) Summary Barrel bombs are not especially effective weapons. They are often poorly constructed; they fail to detonate more often than other devices constructed for a similar purpose; and their lack of precision means they can have a disproportionate effect on civilian populations. However, combatants continue to use barrel bombs in conflicts, including in recent and ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, and they are ideally suited to the requirements of resource-poor states. Analysis Barrel bombs are improvised devices that contain explosive filling and shrapnel packed into a container, often in a cylindrical shape such as a barrel. The devices continue to be dropped on towns all over Syria . Indeed, there have been several documented cases of their use in Iraq over the past months, and residents of the city of Mosul, which was re...

Russia Looks East for New Oil Markets

Click to Enlarge In the final years of the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began orienting his foreign policy toward Asia in response to a rising Japan. Putin has also piloted a much-touted pivot to Asia, coinciding with renewed U.S. interest in the area. A good expression of intent was Russia's hosting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2012 in Vladivostok, near Russia's borders with China and North Korea. Although its efforts in Asia have been limited by more direct interests in Russia's periphery and in Europe, Moscow recently has been able to look more to the east. Part of this renewed interest involves finding new export markets for Russian hydrocarbons. Russia's economy relies on energy exports, particularly crude oil and natural gas exported via pipeline to the West. However, Western Europe is diversifying its energy sources as new supplies come online out of a desire to reduce its dependence on Russian energy supplies . This has ...

LONDON POLICE INDIRECTLY ENCOURAGE CRIMINALS TO ATTACK RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC PROPERTY

ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGE A few days ago an unknown perpetrator trespassed on the territory of the Russian Trade Delegation in London, causing damage to the property and the vehicles belonging to the trade delegation , Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said during the September 12 press briefing. The diplomat revealed the response by the London police was discouraging. Police told that the case does not have any prospects and is likely to be closed. This was made despite the fact that the British law enforcement was provided with video surveillance tapes and detailed information shedding light on the incident. By this byehavior, British law inforcements indirectly encourage criminals to continue attacks on Russian diplomatic property in the UK. Zakharova’s statement on “Trespassing on the Russian Trade Mission premises in London” ( source ): During our briefings, we have repeatedly discussed compliance with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, sp...