Skip to main content

Hungary to Address Foreign-Denominated Loan Repayments



The name and logo of the Hungarian National Bank (Magyar Nemzeti Bank) adorn the main entrance of the bank headquarters in downtown Budapest.(ATTILA KISBENEDEK/AFP/Getty Images)

Summary


Before the end of the year, Budapest will approve new measures to try to help households repay their foreign-denominated loans. In the coming weeks, the debate will revolve around exactly what to do and how to distribute the costs.

Analysis


The Hungarian government's efforts to relieve households struggling to repay their foreign-denominated loans saw a new chapter June 24, when Economy Minister Mihaly Varga said the government would present a "clear and straightforward solution" before the year ends. This comes after the Hungarian Constitutional Court determined that banks should have offered detailed information about the risk when offering those loans and cannot unilaterally change the terms of the loans.

Before the European crisis, foreign-denominated loans, mostly in Swiss francs but also in euros, were popular among Hungarian households. But the devaluation of the forint made it increasingly difficult for Hungarian households to pay back their foreign-denominated loans. Starting in 2011, Budapest took several steps to help households repay these loans. The main measure was the introduction of a lower exchange rate. This triggered criticism by Hungarian banks, which were forced to absorb the losses. Several major foreign-owned banks have been posting heavy losses for years, and these losses have hurt domestic lending, particularly to households.

Budapest's plan temporarily contained the problem somewhat, but the Hungarian central bank recently warned that after stabilizing in 2012, nonperforming loans grew again over the past year. The bank said this rise can be partly attributed to a large number of households holding back payments in expectation of more assistance from the Hungarian government.

In its May report, the Hungarian central bank urged Budapest to resolve the issue of foreign currency debtors. According to the bank, any resolution should include both nonperforming and performing foreign currency debtors, as "intervention for only nonperforming debtors would undermine willingness to pay and benefit those who had stopped servicing their loans, despite being solvent."

In November, Stratfor wrote that the Hungarian government was waiting for a ruling by the Constitutional Court on the legality of foreign-denominated loans in order to have a strong legal basis for taking additional measures on the issue. The ruling was released June 16 and established that while exposing customers to foreign-exchange risk was not unfair in itself, banks should have offered detailed information about the risk when offering those loans. The ruling also said unilateral modifications in foreign-denominated loans are unfair if the conditions of modification were not specifically defined in the contract. The Hungarian Banking Association called the court's decision "unfair" but accepted it, saying it was willing to discuss new legislation with the government.

The Hungarian government will use this ruling to provide additional relief to foreign-denominated loan holders. Lawmakers from the ruling Fidesz party are currently proposing a two-step process. During the first stage, the government would force banks to compensate customers with foreign-denominated loans for unfair practices, such as unilateral changes in contracts. According to a report by Moody's, banks' compensation payments to customers could amount to around 1 billion euros ($1.36 billion) in total, which represents roughly 11 percent of the banking system's total capital.

Click to Enlarge


In the second stage, all foreign-denominated loans would be phased out from the market. More than half of the outstanding household loans in Hungary are denominated in foreign currency, and of those more than one-fifth are considered nonperforming. According to the latest report by the Hungarian central bank, banks in the country have some $3.6 billion in foreign-denominated nonperforming loans.
Part of a Strategy

The specifics of the upcoming measures are still unclear; Hungarian officials are still analyzing them and negotiating with banks. Several issues will need to be resolved, including the rate at which the foreign-denominated loans would be converted and over what time period. It is also unclear whether the Hungarian government would help the banks carry some of the burden. Over the past few years, Fidesz has approved policies that have hurt Hungarian banks, but the government is not interested in seeing the whole sector collapse. Budapest will try to find a delicate balance between its push against foreign banks and the need to keep the banking sector alive. These negotiations probably will linger through the coming months, and a legislative package is likely to be approved after parliamentary activity resumes in September.

Budapest's moves against the banking sector are part of a strategy to keep its popular support while applying punitive measures on banks. Most banks operating in Hungary are foreign-owned, and Budapest is trying to make their operations progressively harder to sustain so that some lenders eventually leave the country and sell their operations to Fidesz-related investors. This is also in line with the government's plan to expand its participation in economic matters; other sectors such as utilities and the media have also been under economic pressure from the government.

Hungary's most controversial policies -- the nationalization of private pensions, the attempted undermining of the judiciary and the ongoing nationalization of strategic energy assets -- are meant to give the state more power. At a time when the political environment in the region is changing, the Hungarian government believes that centralizing power will boost its domestic position and improve Budapest's prospects for dealing with a weakening European Union, a more assertive Russia and a transforming Central Europe.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why States Still Use Barrel Bombs

Smoke ascends after a Syrian military helicopter allegedly dropped a barrel bomb over the city of Daraya on Jan. 31.(FADI DIRANI/AFP/Getty Images) Summary Barrel bombs are not especially effective weapons. They are often poorly constructed; they fail to detonate more often than other devices constructed for a similar purpose; and their lack of precision means they can have a disproportionate effect on civilian populations. However, combatants continue to use barrel bombs in conflicts, including in recent and ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, and they are ideally suited to the requirements of resource-poor states. Analysis Barrel bombs are improvised devices that contain explosive filling and shrapnel packed into a container, often in a cylindrical shape such as a barrel. The devices continue to be dropped on towns all over Syria . Indeed, there have been several documented cases of their use in Iraq over the past months, and residents of the city of Mosul, which was re

Russia Looks East for New Oil Markets

Click to Enlarge In the final years of the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began orienting his foreign policy toward Asia in response to a rising Japan. Putin has also piloted a much-touted pivot to Asia, coinciding with renewed U.S. interest in the area. A good expression of intent was Russia's hosting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2012 in Vladivostok, near Russia's borders with China and North Korea. Although its efforts in Asia have been limited by more direct interests in Russia's periphery and in Europe, Moscow recently has been able to look more to the east. Part of this renewed interest involves finding new export markets for Russian hydrocarbons. Russia's economy relies on energy exports, particularly crude oil and natural gas exported via pipeline to the West. However, Western Europe is diversifying its energy sources as new supplies come online out of a desire to reduce its dependence on Russian energy supplies . This has

LONDON POLICE INDIRECTLY ENCOURAGE CRIMINALS TO ATTACK RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC PROPERTY

ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGE A few days ago an unknown perpetrator trespassed on the territory of the Russian Trade Delegation in London, causing damage to the property and the vehicles belonging to the trade delegation , Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said during the September 12 press briefing. The diplomat revealed the response by the London police was discouraging. Police told that the case does not have any prospects and is likely to be closed. This was made despite the fact that the British law enforcement was provided with video surveillance tapes and detailed information shedding light on the incident. By this byehavior, British law inforcements indirectly encourage criminals to continue attacks on Russian diplomatic property in the UK. Zakharova’s statement on “Trespassing on the Russian Trade Mission premises in London” ( source ): During our briefings, we have repeatedly discussed compliance with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, specif