Skip to main content

Russia: Intimidating Ukraine, Even Through Diplomacy



A man views what is left of his house in Slovyansk, Ukraine, on June 24.(JOHN MACDOUGALL/AFP/Getty Images)

Summary


Russia's upper house withdrew a key resolution June 25 that authorized the Russian military to intervene in Ukraine. By revoking this decree, Moscow aims to demonstrate its commitment to finding a diplomatic solution to the ongoing crisis. Despite advocating talks between Kiev and the eastern separatists, the Kremlin is focused on protecting its own interests. As long as the Ukrainian government fails to satisfy the Kremlin's main demands, which ultimately boil down to the decentralization and neutralization of Ukraine, Russia will continue supporting the armed separatist movement in eastern Ukraine to apply leverage during its negotiations with Kiev.

Analysis


Russian President Vladimir Putin asked Russia's Federation Council on June 25 to reverse its March decision authorizing military intervention. At the same time, Putin also announced that while he supports Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko's cease-fire, talks with separatists in eastern Ukraine are necessary too. Putin said it is "pointless" for separatist groups to disarm while other groups, such as the pro-Ukrainian Right Sector movement, have not. On June 23, after informal consultations, the self-proclaimed prime minister of the Donestk People's Republic, Alexander Borodai, declared a cease-fire in the region. On June 24, however, separatists near Slovyansk shot down a Ukrainian military Mi-8 helicopter with a man-portable air defense system, killing all on board. Fighting continues in the Slovyansk area and in some of the eastern border regions.

Click to Enlarge


Although Putin's public support for diplomatic talks and the decision of some separatist leaders to call for a cease-fire may lead to a limited de-escalation in eastern Ukraine, a significant reduction in armed separatist activity throughout the contested east is unlikely. EU and U.S. pressure as well as Russia's long-term goal of creating a neutral, decentralized Ukraine have extended the cessation of hostilities. The Kremlin wishes to avoid imposing significant, sectorwide sanctions -- a Russian proposal that the European Union is set to discuss at its upcoming summit this week.

While European leaders are unlikely to agree on effective sanctions against Russia, Moscow is under pressure from Paris and Berlin to take some sort of public action to help resolve the crisis. Russia is not willing to sour relations with two European heavyweights that can help Russia promote its agenda in other areas. By supporting talks, Russia shows it is working to promote de-escalation in eastern Ukraine and aims to avoid further sanctions. On the other hand, these informal consultations enable Russia to continue negotiating over the future of Ukraine while pursuing concessions from the government in Kiev. The Kremlin is also coming under increasing pressure domestically. There is a growing sentiment in Russia that Moscow needs to focus more on domestic matters and less on Ukraine.
A Move in the Right Direction

The participation of Donetsk People's Republic members in informal consultations June 23 signals an evolution in the ongoing conflict. Poroshenko had previously rejected Russian pressure to negotiate with the leadership of the armed separatist movement in eastern Ukraine. Similarly, separatists had opposed the idea of holding direct talks with the government in Kiev. On June 23, separatist leaders, pro-Russian Ukrainian politicians, Russia's ambassador to Ukraine, former Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma and an Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe representative, Heidi Tagliavini, met in Donetsk. While Ukrainian government officials -- who were represented informally by Kuchma -- were notably absent along with some key separatist leaders, the unofficial discussions demonstrated that all parties are open to a limited form of negotiations.





Conversation: Understanding Putin's Logic



Despite the informal consultations, however, the Kiev government, the Kremlin and the various separatist leaders remain divided on most key issues. Even as Borodai declared a cease-fire in Donetsk, he emphasized that the separatist leadership will take part in formal negotiations only if Ukrainian troops leave eastern Ukraine and the self-declared republics are granted a special status under Ukraine's Constitution. While Poroshenko has advocated a cease-fire and proposed decentralization as a part of his peace plan, the separatists' policy demands remain unacceptable to the government in Kiev, which has worked to reassert military control over the eastern regions and strongly opposes the federalization of Ukraine.

For the Kremlin, limiting Ukraine's moves toward European integration and integration with other Western institutions in general remains a priority. When Ukraine signs the European Union's association and free trade agreements on June 27, Russia is likely to respond with some trade restrictions but will not go as far as military intervention or suspending ties with the Kiev government. Russia's long-term goal remains to preserve Ukraine as a neutral buffer state, protecting the Russian core. The Kiev government's aspirations for further Western integration will therefore continue to challenge the Kremlin's position on Ukraine's future.

Poroshenko has indicated that constitutional amendments regarding decentralization will be introduced in the Ukrainian parliament this week, but the timeline for implementation remains unclear. Moreover, critical natural gas negotiations with Russia are ongoing. On these issues, as well as more long-term matters such as Ukraine's integration with Western institutions, the Kremlin is working to safeguard its leverage in ongoing negotiations with Kiev. As a result, Russia will not approve the disarmament or withdrawal of separatist groups operating in eastern Ukraine until Kiev takes significant action on these matters.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why States Still Use Barrel Bombs

Smoke ascends after a Syrian military helicopter allegedly dropped a barrel bomb over the city of Daraya on Jan. 31.(FADI DIRANI/AFP/Getty Images) Summary Barrel bombs are not especially effective weapons. They are often poorly constructed; they fail to detonate more often than other devices constructed for a similar purpose; and their lack of precision means they can have a disproportionate effect on civilian populations. However, combatants continue to use barrel bombs in conflicts, including in recent and ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, and they are ideally suited to the requirements of resource-poor states. Analysis Barrel bombs are improvised devices that contain explosive filling and shrapnel packed into a container, often in a cylindrical shape such as a barrel. The devices continue to be dropped on towns all over Syria . Indeed, there have been several documented cases of their use in Iraq over the past months, and residents of the city of Mosul, which was re

Russia Looks East for New Oil Markets

Click to Enlarge In the final years of the Soviet Union, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began orienting his foreign policy toward Asia in response to a rising Japan. Putin has also piloted a much-touted pivot to Asia, coinciding with renewed U.S. interest in the area. A good expression of intent was Russia's hosting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2012 in Vladivostok, near Russia's borders with China and North Korea. Although its efforts in Asia have been limited by more direct interests in Russia's periphery and in Europe, Moscow recently has been able to look more to the east. Part of this renewed interest involves finding new export markets for Russian hydrocarbons. Russia's economy relies on energy exports, particularly crude oil and natural gas exported via pipeline to the West. However, Western Europe is diversifying its energy sources as new supplies come online out of a desire to reduce its dependence on Russian energy supplies . This has

LONDON POLICE INDIRECTLY ENCOURAGE CRIMINALS TO ATTACK RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC PROPERTY

ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGE A few days ago an unknown perpetrator trespassed on the territory of the Russian Trade Delegation in London, causing damage to the property and the vehicles belonging to the trade delegation , Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said during the September 12 press briefing. The diplomat revealed the response by the London police was discouraging. Police told that the case does not have any prospects and is likely to be closed. This was made despite the fact that the British law enforcement was provided with video surveillance tapes and detailed information shedding light on the incident. By this byehavior, British law inforcements indirectly encourage criminals to continue attacks on Russian diplomatic property in the UK. Zakharova’s statement on “Trespassing on the Russian Trade Mission premises in London” ( source ): During our briefings, we have repeatedly discussed compliance with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, specif